Skip to content

chore: add empty vscode settings for yarn-project - #23808

Merged
spalladino merged 1 commit into
merge-train/spartanfrom
spl/empty-settings
Jun 2, 2026
Merged

chore: add empty vscode settings for yarn-project#23808
spalladino merged 1 commit into
merge-train/spartanfrom
spl/empty-settings

Conversation

@spalladino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This allows us to then make local changes to vs code settings in yarn-project, and then ignore them via skip-worktree so they persist across git clean operations triggered by bootstrap.

This allows us to then make local changes and ignore them via
`skip-worktree` so they persist across `git clean` operations triggered
by bootstrap.
@spalladino
spalladino merged commit 75fdca8 into merge-train/spartan Jun 2, 2026
8 of 9 checks passed
@spalladino
spalladino deleted the spl/empty-settings branch June 2, 2026 20:01
danielntmd pushed a commit to danielntmd/aztec-packages that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2026
BEGIN_COMMIT_OVERRIDE
chore: deploy next-net and reuse contracts (AztecProtocol#23761)
chore: turn on autoscaling (AztecProtocol#23706)
chore: rename staging-public to staging (AztecProtocol#23767)
chore(p2p): use sync hash for tx validation hashing (AztecProtocol#23768)
test(e2e): wait warmup slots in slashing tests (AztecProtocol#23719)
feat(api)!: make getTxReceipt the single tx-lookup API (AztecProtocol#23660)
fix: cap cloned n_tps fees within sponsored FPC balance (AztecProtocol#23770)
fix: protect HA validator Postgres from cluster scale-down (AztecProtocol#23772)
refactor: remove non-pipelining sequencer code path (AztecProtocol#23665)
feat(archiver): add getL2ToL1MembershipWitness node RPC (AztecProtocol#23646)
fix(p2p)!: revamp BLOCK_TXS validations (AztecProtocol#23778)
chore: name the bots (AztecProtocol#23795)
fix(e2e): ensure BBSync init (AztecProtocol#23793)
fix(p2p)!: fix BLOCK_TXS response under proposer equivocation (AztecProtocol#23786)
fix: reconnect L1 port-forward after epoch-boundary sleep in n_tps_prove
(AztecProtocol#23800)
chore: add empty vscode settings for yarn-project (AztecProtocol#23808)
fix(sequencer): only warn about missing proposed checkpoint once overdue
(AztecProtocol#23807)
fix: refresh n_tps fee quotes during sustained benchmark (AztecProtocol#23797)
fix(sequencer): enforce build-frame deadlines and align
attestation/publish windows (AztecProtocol#23776)
END_COMMIT_OVERRIDE
spalladino added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2026
## Motivation

`v5-next` was cut from `next` at cbc99df (Jun 1), so PRs merged to
`merge-train/spartan` after the cut never flowed into it. This backports
all of them (authored by @spalladino and @fcarreiro) to keep v5-next
current with the spartan train.

## Approach

Each PR is cherry-picked from its squashed merge commit on
`merge-train/spartan`, in merge order, preserving the original commit
message and PR number — one commit per backported PR. All 11 applied
cleanly with no conflicts; patches are identical to the originals
(verified via `git patch-id`), and `bootstrap.sh build yarn-project`
passes on the result. Labeled `ci-no-squash` to preserve the per-PR
commits.

## Backported PRs

- #23768 — chore(p2p): use sync hash for tx validation hashing
- #23719 — test(e2e): wait warmup slots in slashing tests
- #23660 — feat(api)!: make getTxReceipt the single tx-lookup API
- #23665 — refactor: remove non-pipelining sequencer code path
- #23646 — feat(archiver): add getL2ToL1MembershipWitness node RPC
- #23778 — fix(p2p)!: revamp BLOCK_TXS validations
- #23786 — fix(p2p)!: fix BLOCK_TXS response under proposer equivocation
- #23808 — chore: add empty vscode settings for yarn-project
- #23807 — fix(sequencer): only warn about missing proposed checkpoint
once overdue
- #23776 — fix(sequencer): enforce build-frame deadlines and align
attestation/publish windows
- #23818 — chore(p2p): BlockTxsRequest comment

Note #23660, #23778, and #23786 are breaking changes (node RPC +
tx-effect db format, and p2p wire format respectively), as they were on
`next`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants