Skip to content

docs: fail CI when the aztec.js reference drifts - #25249

Merged
vezenovm merged 18 commits into
merge-train/fairiesfrom
mv/aztecjs-reference-drift-check
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

docs: fail CI when the aztec.js reference drifts#25249
vezenovm merged 18 commits into
merge-train/fairiesfrom
mv/aztecjs-reference-drift-check

Conversation

@vezenovm

@vezenovm vezenovm commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Stacked on #25248, which regenerates the page.

The aztec.js reference sat eight months out of date because nothing watched it. Docs CI never regenerated or diffed it (docs/bootstrap.sh only builds and spellchecks). The release checklist regenerates the aztec-nr API, the TypeDoc TypeScript API and the three CLI references but not this one. The v5.1.0 release refreshed all of those in the same commit and left this page on its December content.

Two changes so it cannot happen again:

  • update_docs.sh --check regenerates into a temp file and diffs it against the committed page, ignoring the generation timestamp the page stamps into itself. docs/bootstrap.sh gains a check_generated_refs step, so a change to yarn-project/aztec.js/src that alters the reference cannot land without the regenerated page. It skips on arm64 CI, matching build_docs and test_cmds.

Verification

  • Red: with the December page restored in the working tree
  • Green: on this branch it exits 0 (✓ Reference matches aztec.js), and the temp files are cleaned up.
  • Scoped deliberately to this one artifact. The CLI references are generated from the installed dockerized release CLI rather than from the working tree, and the aztec-nr and TypeDoc references are release-pinned. The node JSON-RPC reference does regenerate byte-identically from source today, so it would be a cheap second candidate if we want one.

Two bugs made a regeneration of the aztec.js API reference unlandable, which is
part of why the committed reference had not been refreshed since December.

The generator emitted multi-line types inside inline code spans. A type body
containing a blank line closes the span early, leaving its braces and angle
brackets to be parsed as MDX expressions and JSX tags, so the page no longer
compiled and the docs build failed. Emit a fenced code block for multi-line
types instead, matching what format_return_type already did, and collapse
destructured parameter names onto one line.

The table of contents also built anchors with its own slug logic, which stripped
underscores that Docusaurus keeps. That left CAPABILITY_VERSION and the
Contract / Protocol_Contracts section unreachable, and pointed NO_WAIT and
NO_FROM at the NoWait and NoFrom headings instead. Derive the anchor from the
rendered heading text the way github-slugger does.

Also fix the aztec.js JSDoc that a regenerated reference trips cspell on: a
"metadata" typo and the repo-flagged "on-chain" spelling.
Last generated on 2025-12-10, so the committed reference had drifted a long way
from the source: 19 documented symbols no longer exist in aztec.js (including
getGasLimits, which moved to the wallet SDK) and 82 current exports were missing
entirely.
@vezenovm
vezenovm force-pushed the mv/aztecjs-reference-drift-check branch 2 times, most recently from 512e282 to dd9b0b9 Compare August 17, 2026 17:32
The aztec.js reference sat eight months out of date because nothing watched it:
docs CI never regenerated or diffed it, it declares no `references:` frontmatter
so the devrel drift alert ignored it, and the release checklist regenerated the
aztec-nr, TypeDoc and CLI references but not this one.

Add `--check` to update_docs.sh, which regenerates into a temp file and diffs it
against the committed page, ignoring the generation timestamp the page stamps into
itself. Wire it into docs/bootstrap.sh so a change to yarn-project/aztec.js/src
that alters the reference cannot land without the regenerated page, and add the
regeneration step to the release checklist so a release cannot ship a stale one
either.

The temp-file cleanup moves to an EXIT trap, since --check returns before the
deploy step the old cleanup line sat after.
@vezenovm
vezenovm force-pushed the mv/aztecjs-reference-drift-check branch from dd9b0b9 to 0f7be00 Compare August 17, 2026 17:38
@vezenovm
vezenovm marked this pull request as ready for review August 17, 2026 18:16
The parser walked subdirectories in fs.readdirSync order and sorted files with
localeCompare, so the module and file order in the generated page depended on
the filesystem and on the runtime's locale data: the same sources produced a
different page on macOS and on Linux. Sort both by code unit. Reversing every
readdir now leaves the regenerated page identical apart from its timestamp.
Two rounds of the check failing in CI could not be diagnosed from the log,
because the failure only said to regenerate. Print the diff: the generator infers
return types through the type checker, so its output depends on which
yarn-project packages the environment has built, and that kind of drift does not
reproduce on the author's machine.
Nine public members had no return annotation, so the generated API reference
documented them through the type checker. Write the types out. They are the types
the checker already reported, except waitForProven, which becomes
Promise<BlockNumber> rather than retryUntil's Promise<NonNullable<BlockNumber>>.
The parser resolved @aztec/* imports, so an inferred return type depended on
which sibling packages the environment had built: a page generated against a full
build silently differed from one generated against a partial build, and the
difference only surfaced in CI. Resolve relative imports only, so the page is a
function of the aztec.js sources and nothing else. Types that cross a package
boundary now have to be annotated in the source. Parsing also drops from ~50s to
~8s, since the checker no longer reads the workspace's declaration files.
@vezenovm
vezenovm marked this pull request as draft August 18, 2026 11:23
yarn-project/aztec.js/src/contract/protocol_contracts is gitignored build
output, generated from the compiled Noir protocol contracts. Documenting it
made the page depend on noir-projects: a checkout cannot regenerate or verify
the reference without those artifacts, and a change to a protocol contract
left the committed page stale.

The page now covers 8 modules and 182 exports, and generating it with that
directory absent produces the same bytes.
Base automatically changed from mv/aztecjs-reference-regen to merge-train/fairies August 18, 2026 16:45
…ecjs-reference-drift-check

# Conflicts:
#	docs/docs-developers/docs/aztec-js/aztec_js_reference.md
#	docs/scripts/aztecjs_reference_generation/parse_typescript.js
#	docs/scripts/aztecjs_reference_generation/transform_to_markdown.py
@vezenovm
vezenovm marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2026 16:54

@nchamo nchamo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you manage to merge it before the repo split, then great. If not, we would need to port this to the new repo

exit 0
fi

# Print the drift. Not every cause reproduces on the author's machine: the generator infers

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

relativeImportsOnlyHost (added later in this PR) makes the checker resolve relative imports only, so sibling build state can't change the output any more. Should we drop that part of the comment? Otherwise someone hitting a red check here will go rebuild yarn-project for nothing.

Comment thread docs/scripts/aztecjs_reference_generation/update_docs.sh Outdated
@vezenovm
vezenovm enabled auto-merge (squash) August 19, 2026 08:49
@vezenovm
vezenovm merged commit 42a048d into merge-train/fairies Aug 19, 2026
10 checks passed
@vezenovm
vezenovm deleted the mv/aztecjs-reference-drift-check branch August 19, 2026 08:59
vezenovm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2026
… rename (#25270)

Fixes the `docs` job on `merge-train/fairies` ([failing
run](http://ci.aztec-labs.com/1787129975967580), [docs
log](http://ci.aztec-labs.com/9e1fa3ea2d75498d)).

## What broke

The `check generated aztec.js reference` step added by #25249 fires on
its own merge commit:

```
-  node: Pick<AztecNode, 'getBlockData' | 'getL1ToL2MessageCheckpoint'>,   committed page
+  node: Pick<AztecNode, 'getBlockData' | 'getL1ToL2MessageIndex'>,        regenerated from source
```

Three commits in this order:

| When (UTC) | What |
| --- | --- |
| Aug 18 16:45 | #25248 (`88bcee5650d`) regenerated
`aztec_js_reference.md`. aztec.js used `getL1ToL2MessageCheckpoint`
then, so the page recorded `Checkpoint`. |
| Aug 18 21:04 | #25258 (`88426665a33`, merge-train/spartan) renamed the
API back to `getL1ToL2MessageIndex` in
`stdlib/src/interfaces/aztec-node.ts` and
`aztec.js/src/utils/cross_chain.ts`, without touching the page — nothing
forced it to, the check did not exist yet. |
| Aug 19 08:59 | #25249 (`42a048d1a2c`) squash-merged into
`merge-train/fairies`, which already contained #25258. |

#25249's own CI was green because CI3 runs on the PR head, not on a
merge with the base ([run
32234449928](https://github.com/AztecProtocol/aztec-packages/actions/runs/32234449928),
`head_sha 56d47aa`): on that tree `cross_chain.ts` still said
`Checkpoint`, so page and source agreed. The rename only meets the stale
page at merge time — a semantic merge conflict a head-only CI cannot
see. The check is doing exactly its job; the page really did document an
export signature that no longer exists.

## This change

Output of the documented regeneration command, nothing hand-edited:

```
cd docs && ./scripts/aztecjs_reference_generation/update_docs.sh current
```

Six lines: the three `getL1ToL2MessageCheckpoint` →
`getL1ToL2MessageIndex` occurrences in `waitForL1ToL2MessageReady` /
`isL1ToL2MessageReady` (signature block plus parameter list), and the
`Generated:` timestamp the page stamps into itself. `--check` ignores
that timestamp, so it is cosmetic here.

Verified locally on this branch:
`./scripts/aztecjs_reference_generation/update_docs.sh --check` exits 0
with `✓ Reference matches aztec.js` (it fails on the branch tip without
this commit).

## Note for `next`

The same drift is already sitting on `next`: the page there has
`getL1ToL2MessageCheckpoint` while `aztec-node.ts` has
`getL1ToL2MessageIndex`. `next` just does not have
`check_generated_refs` in `docs/bootstrap.sh` yet — that arrives with
this train. So `next`'s docs job starts failing the moment the fairies
train merges unless this regeneration rides along with it.


---
*Created by
[claudebox](https://claudebox.work/v2/sessions/9e5a3b3c6fb75454/jobs/2)
· group: `slackbot` · requested by Maxim Vezenov · [Slack
thread](https://aztecprotocol.slack.com/archives/C0BFRKFSLMP/p1787130402250539?thread_ts=1787130402.250539&cid=C0BFRKFSLMP)*
AztecBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2026
## Summary

Publishes `v5.2.0` as the shared release for both **Alpha (Mainnet)** and **Testnet** across developer and network/operator documentation, and removes the deprecated `v5.1.0` snapshots.

- both `mainnet` and `testnet` selectors resolve to the same `v5.2.0` snapshot
- developer and network/operator snapshots cut from the `v5.2.0` tag (`49a592109ec`), so `#include_code` snippets and version macros freeze against what shipped
- Aztec.nr, TypeScript, Aztec.js, `aztec` / `aztec-wallet` / `aztec-up` CLI, operator `aztec start` CLI and Node JSON-RPC references all regenerated at the tag
- identical generated API artifacts under the stable `mainnet` and `testnet` paths
- `networks.md` re-derived from the node RPCs and on-chain reads

A backport of this release into `v5-next` is [#25265](#25265).

## Merged `next` (2026-08-19)

`next` moved 64 commits while this was open. Merged and resolved; `yarn build` re-run green on the merged tree. Two conflicts, both around the Aztec.js reference:

- `docs/scripts/aztecjs_reference_generation/transform_to_markdown.py` — **took `next`'s version wholesale.** [#25248](#25248) landed a proper `HeadingSlugger` (github-slugger semantics including the `-1`/`-2` uniqueness suffixes) and code-block handling for multi-line types, which supersedes the two narrower fixes this PR originally carried.
- `docs/docs-developers/docs/aztec-js/aztec_js_reference.md` — **took `next`'s version.** [#25249](#25249) added `update_docs.sh --check` to `docs/bootstrap.sh`, so the committed source page must match what the generator produces from the working tree. Regenerating on the merged tree reproduces `next`'s page byte-for-byte (modulo the self-stamped timestamp) and `--check` passes.

The **v5.2.0 snapshot's** copy of that page was regenerated with `next`'s generator against the `v5.2.0` tag's `aztec.js` source, so the released snapshot gets the improved anchors and code-block formatting while still documenting v5.2.0's API.

Also reconciled from `next` into the snapshot: [#25220](#25220 clarification that `teardownGasLimits` is carved out of `gasLimits` rather than added to it. Verified true at the tag (`yarn-project/stdlib/src/gas/gas_settings.ts`: "teardown gas is reserved from gasLimits during private execution ... the effective gas available for app logic is `gasLimits - teardownGasLimits - privateOverhead`"). The other post-tag doc changes on `next` are fast-inbox / AZIP-22 work (`inbox.md`, the `MessageSent` signature and message-availability wording in `token_bridge.md` and `uniswap_swap.md`, and dropping `AZTEC_INBOX_LAG`), which is not in v5.2.0 — deliberately **not** backported, so the snapshot keeps the wording that is correct for the release.

## Release details

Verified from the node RPCs at cut time:

| | Alpha (Mainnet) | Testnet |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `nodeVersion` from RPC | `5.1.0` | `5.2.0-nightly.20260815` |
| `rollupVersion` | `4248422647` | `1821665230` |
| L1 chain id | `1` | `11155111` |

Per the instruction that the network versions are unchanged, the **Version** row in `networks.md` stays `5.1.0` for both columns; only the documentation version advances to `v5.2.0`.

Every figure in `networks.md` was re-derived rather than carried forward:

- all L1 addresses in both columns match `aztec_getNodeInfo`
- Slasher, Honk verifier, Reward Booster, Tally Slashing Proposer and Slash Payload Cloneable re-read on chain from the Rollup / Slasher / Proposer for both networks, all unchanged
- rollup version read from `getVersion()` on both rollups; chain ids from `cast chain-id`
- governance parameters re-read on chain for **both** columns: proposer quorum 600/1000 and 60/100; voting delay, duration and execution delay decoded from `getConfiguration()` (mainnet 3 d / 7 d / 2 d, testnet 12 h / 24 h / 12 h); slashing quorum 65/128 over 4 epochs (128 slots)

### The canonical SponsoredFPC address changes under v5.2.0 tooling, and the new one is not deployed

`aztec get-canonical-sponsored-fpc-address` built from the `v5.2.0` tag returns:

```
0x2ece607a8dba690c9aa4ee1d53a55286fa815543a27f9364bbaf65eb68e7315b   (class id 0x1cf37d561fb76ae2b95d3c395c3204c1dab4a6309b045a3fc17a58483c5ad2e9)
```

Testnet has nothing at that address (`aztec_getContract` returns `null`). What is deployed and funded is the v5.1.0-built FPC, `0x130925fb...923296` (class id `0x184e81e5...8673a5`), which is what this PR keeps.

The SponsoredFPC Noir source is byte-identical between `v5.1.0` and `v5.2.0` — the address moved purely because the Noir compiler went `beta.22` to `beta.25`, which changes the compiled bytecode, the contract class id, and therefore the derived address. The same thing happened at the v5.1.0 cut, where a new FPC was deployed and funded.

The consequence is worth stating plainly: `wallet.registerContract` does not validate that the supplied artifact matches the instance's class (explicit comment in `yarn-project/wallet-sdk/src/base-wallet/base_wallet.ts`), so `aztec-wallet register-contract ... SponsoredFPC` appears to succeed on v5.2.0 tooling and then fails at simulation, because the PXE only holds the `0x1cf37d...` artifact. **Either a v5.2.0-built SponsoredFPC is deployed and funded on testnet at `0x2ece...` and this PR is repointed at it, or sponsored fees on testnet stay pinned to v5.1.0 tooling.**

## Documentation content changes

### Aztec.nr: the v5.2.0 breaking change was live in three doc snippets

Note structs declared inside a `contract` block must now be `pub` (Noir `beta.25`, [#24907](#24907)). `state_variables.md` (`AddressNote`, `UintNote`), `functions/attributes.md` (`CustomNote`) and the `#[custom_note]` example in the `notes.nr` doc comment (published through `nargo doc`) all showed non-`pub` declarations that do not compile on v5.2.0. Every `.nr` **source** file the docs pull in via `#include_code` was already `pub`, so the defect was confined to prose snippets.

### Migration notes

- The `pub` note-visibility entry was filed under `## 5.1.0`, but the Noir `beta.25` bump that causes it is not in the `v5.1.0` tag. Moved to a new `## 5.2.0` section.
- Four v5.2.0 behaviour changes had no migration note at all, each verified against `v5.1.0..v5.2.0`: the zero-peer proposing gate (`SEQ_MIN_PEERS_TO_PROPOSE`), JSON-RPC internal errors moving from `-32600` to `-32603`, `GET /status` gaining a per-component JSON body (and the widened `StatusCheckFn`), and the removal of `deserializeArrayFromVector` from `@aztec/foundation/serialize`.
- The `## TBD` entries on this branch are left untouched: they describe changes on this line that have not shipped in a release yet.

### Operator / node docs

All eight new v5.2.0 env vars were missing from the CLI reference; regenerating it at the tag picks them up, along with `--proverNode.proofSubmissionTargetAddress`, which existed in v5.1.0 code but was never documented. Hand edits on top:

| File | Change |
| --- | --- |
| `reference/changelog/v5.2.md` | new page; the operator changelog stopped at v4.3.x. Plus index and sidebar entries |
| `concepts/monitoring.md` | claimed the node emits no "about to be slashed" metric; it now does, so that section carries the real logs and metrics |
| `monitoring/metrics-reference.md` | new own-validator slashing metrics section (with alert rule) and JSON-RPC server metrics section |
| `concepts/sequencer-troubleshooting.md` | the four peerless-node gates, plus the `/status` health check and `P2P_HEALTH_MIN_PEERS` |
| `reference/reading-logs.md` | five new entries: fatal p2p start failure, zero-peer warning, skipped proposal, mempool drop reasons, slash-target warning |
| `sequencer-management/governance-participation.md` | the node now stops signalling an executed payload; `GOVERNANCE_PROPOSER_FORCE_PAYLOAD_VOTE` escape hatch |
| `concepts/l1-rpc.md` | server-side filter methods are no longer required; watchers poll bounded `eth_getLogs` |
| `provider/start-node.mdx`, `solo-sequencer/start-node.mdx` | sample `nodeVersion` `5.0.0` to `5.2.0` |

Reviewed on the deploy preview by @yev.

### Developer docs

- `tutorials/js_tutorials/aave_bridge.md` pinned `@aztec/l1-artifacts` to a literal version; it now uses the version macro like every other pin on that page, so it stops going stale each release.
- `aztec-js/how_to_send_transaction.md` documents the new first-receipt-poll delay and `initialDelay` ([#25089](#25089)).
- `@aztec/viem@2.38.2` is deliberately left alone in the three tutorials that pin it: it tracks upstream `viem`, not the release line.

**Known gap, not fixed here:** the declarative deployment framework at `@aztec/aztec/deploy` ([#24685](#24685)), headlined as "New in this release", has **zero** documentation. It wants a new `aztec-js` page; that was scoped but not written, rather than shipping a half-verified page for a new API.

## Non-docs changes

Three one-line source edits, all comment-only, no behaviour change:

- `archiver/src/config.ts` and `stdlib/src/interfaces/archiver.ts` — `on-chain` to `onchain`, so the regenerated operator CLI reference passes the repo's own spellcheck (`on-chain` is a repo-wide `flagWord`)
- `noir-projects/labs/aztec-nr/aztec/src/macros/notes.nr` — the `pub` fix in the `#[custom_note]` doc comment

The equivalent `aztec.js` JSDoc fixes this PR originally carried are gone: `next` made the same corrections upstream, so the merge left nothing to change.

## Validation

`MAINNET_TAG=5.2.0 TESTNET_TAG=5.2.0 RELEASE_TYPE=mainnet COMMIT_TAG=v5.2.0 yarn build`, re-run on the merged tree:

- CSpell: 682 files, **0 issues**
- Redirect targets: 185 checked, all valid
- API reference links: 112 checked, **0 broken, 0 version mismatches**
- Docusaurus production build: **successful**
- `./scripts/aztecjs_reference_generation/update_docs.sh --check`: **✓ Reference matches aztec.js**
- no unresolved `#release_version` / `#release_network` / `#include_code` macros in either snapshot
- version configs and version lists carry one shared `v5.2.0` snapshot for both Alpha and Testnet
- generated `mainnet` and `testnet` Aztec.nr and TypeScript API directories are byte-identical
- empty `## TBD` heading stripped from the cut snapshot's migration notes

Remaining broken-anchor warnings are the pre-existing ones only (the `validator-keys|valkeys` CLI alias and the operator compose-page anchors); `onBrokenAnchors` is `warn`, so the build passes.

**Not run:** the functional validation pass (walking the guides and tutorials against a live local network). This container has no Docker daemon, so the dockerized `aztec` CLI could not be installed; everything above was produced from a source build of the tag with shims for `aztec` / `aztec-wallet` / `aztec-up`. The guides and tutorials in this snapshot are link- and spell-validated but not executed.

---
*Created by [claudebox](https://claudebox.work/v2/sessions/c8d26e6f93543878/jobs/12) · group: `slackbot` · requested by Alejo Amiras · [Slack thread](https://aztecfoundation.slack.com/archives/C0B24G1GFGB/p1787064177273599?thread_ts=1787064177.273599&cid=C0B24G1GFGB)*
AztecBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2026
next landed its own regeneration + CI drift gate (#25248, #25249, #25270)
while this PR was open; drop the now-duplicated Step 6 paragraph and update
the wording that claimed the reference had no CI hook.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants