This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 14, 2023. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 14, 2023. It is now read-only.
Table Storage SDK treatment of Int32 / Int64 is sub-optimal. #32
Description
Following link from Python Storage SDK and posting here.
Service
Table
Which version of the SDK was used? Please provide the output of pip freeze.
azure-storage 0.36.0
What problem was encountered?
SDK does not work as expected when dealing with Int32 / Int64 values in table storage.
If you assign an 'int' to a table column read from storage that is Int32 the SDK happily writes it back as Int64. This breaks expected behaviour and seems to be the result of the default Int64 change in 0.31.0.
The majority of other language SDKs still default to Int32 so integration into a solution that leverages table storage through various other languages results in unexpected issues too.
Have you found a mitigation/solution?
Yes. You must explicitly assign the 'int' value to the 'value' property of the inbound entity column rather than simply assigning the 'int' to the column. This is clunky to code with.
Activity
huajunzhao commentedon Jul 3, 2020
Is there any fix?
sjwaight commentedon Jul 6, 2020
As per mitigation - you must explicitly use the Int type you wish to write to Table Storage.