Tried to make a beeping sound

[Blaubart]

Hi,

I tried to make a beeping sound so I used gen.SleepMode(true); and gen.SleepMode(false); to start and stop the sound. But I get a clicking noise. Is there a better way to realise beeping?

[ma7555]

I am having a similar issue, were you able to solve it?
https://forum.arduino.cc/t/popping-sound-when-disabling-output-from-sine-tone-generator-ad9833/1099574

[Blaubart]

I solved it by using while loop and two commands:
gen.IncrementFrequency (REG0, freq);
gen.ApplySignal(SINE_WAVE, REG0, 0);

gen.IncrementFrequency is able to increase or decrease frequency gradually to the value you like to have. If the sound should stop I use gen.ApplySignal(SINE_WAVE, REG0, 0);

[ma7555]

I tried gen.ApplySignal(SINE_WAVE, REG0, 0); but the clicking is the same as with gen.EnableOutput(false);
Do you keep decreasing frequency till 0?

[Blaubart]

Yes I decreased till 0

…

Am 14.03.2023 um 17:39 schrieb ma7555 ***@***.*** ***@***.***>>: I tried gen.ApplySignal(SINE_WAVE, REG0, 0); but the clicking is the same as with gen.EnableOutput(false); Do you keep decreasing frequency till 0? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#9 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABSBDZEUNTNGHUOWEHLRNSTW4CNN5ANCNFSM4NN57GRQ>. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.

[ma7555]

I start at freq 5000 and then did this

    for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
        gen.IncrementFrequency(REG0, -1000);
    }
    gen.ApplySignal(SINE_WAVE, REG0, 0);

But the click is still there. Can you post your code?

[Blaubart]

freqValueNeg = (-1 * freqValueOld) / 8; int i = 0; while (i < 8 && freqValueNeg < 0) { i = i + 1; gen.IncrementFrequency (REG0, freqValueNeg); delay(1); } gen.ApplySignal(SINE_WAVE, REG0, 0); freqValueOld = 0;

…

Am 14.03.2023 um 21:22 schrieb ma7555 ***@***.***>: I start at freq 5000 and then did this for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { gen.IncrementFrequency(REG0, -1000); } gen.ApplySignal(SINE_WAVE, REG0, 0); But the click is still there. Can you post your code? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#9 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABSBDZCPYY6PKAJXABSG5ULW4DHQLANCNFSM4NN57GRQ>. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.

[ma7555]

I still find the cleanest turn off is using

      gen.EnableOutput(true);
      delay(1000);
      gen.EnableOutput(false);

Thanks bro for your help

[Blaubart]

pefect! Sorry, that I couldn’t really help!!

…

Am 21.03.2023 um 22:04 schrieb ma7555 ***@***.***>: I still find the cleanest turn off is using gen.EnableOutput(true); delay(1000); gen.EnableOutput(false); Thanks bro for your help — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#9 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABSBDZBOK54H5S277CXUMD3W5IJXVANCNFSM4NN57GRQ>. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.