Skip to content

Selection Resources and References descriptions are very similar #833

Description

@ahouseholder

The two descriptions are very alike. Can we rephrase them, so that the difference of these fields is show more clearly?

Maybe, clearly state that the resources are about the decision points by stating: decision_point_resources.

And that references are about the decision context by renaming it to decision_context or basis_for_decision or decision_base_references

Originally posted by @tschmidtb51 in #821 (comment)

Activity

  1. added
    integrationRelated to integration of SSVC into another framework or system
    on Jul 29, 2025
  2. added
    tech/backendBack-end tools, code, infrastructure
    tech/dataData implementation (content of /data, data object instances, etc.)
    on Aug 19, 2025
  3. sei-vsarvepalli commented on Aug 20, 2025

    @sei-vsarvepalli
    Contributor
  4. ahouseholder commented on Aug 21, 2025

    @ahouseholder
    ContributorAuthor

    Resolved by #833

  5. tschmidtb51 commented on Aug 25, 2025

    @tschmidtb51
    Contributor

    Thank you for renaming resources to decision_point_resources 😄

  6. tschmidtb51 commented on Aug 25, 2025

    @tschmidtb51
    Contributor

    Was there a specific reason not to rename references?

    (Just wondering - but if we want to change it, we need to do that before Wednesday 13:00 CEST).

  7. sei-vsarvepalli commented on Aug 25, 2025

    @sei-vsarvepalli
    Contributor

    Was there a specific reason not to rename references?

    (Just wondering - but if we want to change it, we need to do that before Wednesday 13:00 CEST).

    My decision was based on this the references is itself broader, it made sense to leave it as it is.

  8. tschmidtb51 commented on Aug 25, 2025

    @tschmidtb51
    Contributor

    Was there a specific reason not to rename references?
    (Just wondering - but if we want to change it, we need to do that before Wednesday 13:00 CEST).

    My decision was based on this the references is itself broader, it made sense to leave it as it is.

    Thank you for the clarification

  9. added this to the 2025-09 milestone on Sep 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

integrationRelated to integration of SSVC into another framework or systemtech/backendBack-end tools, code, infrastructuretech/dataData implementation (content of /data, data object instances, etc.)

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions