ctsm5.4.063: Move CTSM tests from t232 to t233

[slevis-lmwg]

• Update branch and then REBASE to master right after the next b4b-dev merge to master

Description of changes

Updating

• testlist_clm.xml

• ExpectedTestFails.xml

• config_compsets.xml

• .rst and README files that need the update

• RTM, MOSART, and mizuRoute testlists do not include references to 232

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any:

CTSM issues resolved or otherwise addressed, if any:
Contributes to #2540
Resolves #4238

Testing planned or performed, if any:

• ./run_sys_tests -s aux_clm -c ctsm5.4.058 --skip-generate with only ccs_config updated to tag 92 (additional submodules are getting updated on master)
  • derecho tests_0929-181958de
    • LII2FINIDATAREAS_D_P256x2_Ld1.f09_t233.I1850Clm60BgcCrop.derecho_intel.clm-default tests require special handling to pass COMPARE_base_no_interp. Return these to t232 to resolve when we are ready to finalize ICs. Open issue and link to ICs issue.
    • Investigate a few other failures BUT wait to rerun aux_clm after the rebase
  • izumi tests_0929-184523iz, resubmitting one test

Requirements before merge:

• I have followed the CTSM contribution guidelines.

• The code in this PR branch builds with no errors.
• The code in this PR branch runs with no errors. Briefly describe tested configuration(s):
• This does not change answers for unchanged tests; tests going from t232 to t233 run on the new grid and have their names updated, so the test-suites will not compare them to the baseline
• This PR includes required documentation updates
• Update ChangeLog/Sum

[slevis-lmwg]

Blocked by ESMCI/ccs_config_cesm#305 and subsequent CTSM .gitmodules update in ESCOMP master #4232.

[slevis-lmwg]

@ekluzek only the LII2 tests raise a question in this PR. In particular, these tests require special handling to pass COMPARE_base_no_interp. My preference would be to return these to t232 and resolve later AND/OR move these tests to a grid less likely to change any time soon. What do you think?

[ekluzek]

Hey @slevis-lmwg this is great.

I did a "git grep t232" and noticed a few more things to handle...

cime_config/testdefs/ExpectedTestFails.xml:
cime_config/testdefs/testlist_clm.xml:
doc/source/users_guide/setting-up-and-running-a-case/customizing-the-clm-namelist.rst:.. I copied the following file from the baseline for ctsm5.4.047 for the SMS_D_Ld5_PS.f09_f09_mt232.I1850Clm60BgcCrop.derecho_gnu.clm-f09_ObscureStreamOpts test.

On the first two you might as well remove both of those which will complete #4238. The last one might not need anything done with it, but thought it would be good to look at.

[slevis-lmwg]

./run_sys_tests -s aux_clm -c ctsm5.4.062 -g ctsm5.4.063

• derecho
• izumi