Skip to content

[HOLD for payment 2023-10-13] [$500] Chat - Creating a new line in composer causes the composer to jump when expanding #27892

Closed

Description

@lanitochka17

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Action Performed:

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to any chat
  3. Click on the composer
  4. Create a new line by Shift + Enter

Expected Result:

The composer does not jump when expanding

Actual Result:

The composer jumps when expanding

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android / native
  • Android / Chrome
  • iOS / native
  • MacOS / Desktop
  • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
  • Windows / Chrome

Version Number: 1.3.72-6

Reproducible in staging?: Yes

Reproducible in production?: No

If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:

Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):

Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856

Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation

Bug6207916_20230921_020518.mp4

Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:

Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team

Slack conversation:

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0199195af3f24f9d73
  • Upwork Job ID: 1705074693317824512
  • Last Price Increase: 2023-09-22
  • Automatic offers:
    • s-alves10 | Contributor | 26864648

Activity

  1. added
    DeployBlockerCashThis issue or pull request should block deployment
    BugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.
    on Sep 20, 2023
  2. melvin-bot commented on Sep 20, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @johncschuster (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

  3. melvin-bot commented on Sep 20, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

    • This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
    • This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
      • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
    • This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
      • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
      • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
    • This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
      • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
    • I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync
  4. OSBotify commented on Sep 20, 2023

    @OSBotify
    Contributor

    👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open StagingDeployCash deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

    1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
    2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
    3. Fix the issue yourself.
  5. melvin-bot commented on Sep 20, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @tylerkaraszewski (Engineering), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4319 for more details.

  6. tylerkaraszewski commented on Sep 20, 2023

    @tylerkaraszewski
    Contributor

    I've confirmed this happens but I'm not sure where to look to fix it.

  7. dummy-1111 commented on Sep 21, 2023

    @dummy-1111
    Contributor

    Proposal

    Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

    Creating a new line in the main composer causes the composer to jump while expading

    What is the root cause of that problem?

    We determine the vertical padding here based on numberOfLinesProp

    StyleUtils.getComposeTextAreaPadding(numberOfLinesProp, isComposerFullSize),

    And we pass numberOfLines props to RNTextInput component here

    numberOfLines={numberOfLines}

    The problem is in the mismatch of numberOfLines and numberOfLinesProp
    When needed, we change both the numberOfLines state and numberOfLinesProp here

    onNumberOfLinesChange(generalNumberOfLines);
    updateIsFullComposerAvailable({isFullComposerAvailable, setIsFullComposerAvailable}, generalNumberOfLines);
    setNumberOfLines(generalNumberOfLines);

    but changing numberOfLinesProp requires Onyx merge and takes some more time

    Report.saveReportCommentNumberOfLines(reportID, newNumberOfLines);

    So numberOfLinesProps changes a little bit later than numberOfLines state
    This makes the composer jump

    What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

    We don't need to calculate the vertical padding based on numberOfLinesProps props. We have numberOfLines state and get padding based on this. This makes more sense than using props because this value represent the current state of the composer.

        const inputStyleMemo = useMemo(
            () => [
                // We are hiding the scrollbar to prevent it from reducing the text input width,
                // so we can get the correct scroll height while calculating the number of lines.
                numberOfLines < maxLines ? styles.overflowHidden : {},
    
                StyleSheet.flatten([style, {outline: 'none'}]),
                StyleUtils.getComposeTextAreaPadding(numberOfLines, isComposerFullSize),
            ],
            [style, maxLines, numberOfLines, isComposerFullSize],
        );
    

    This works as expected

    Result
    27892.mp4

    What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

  8. 34 remaining items

  9. melvin-bot commented on Oct 6, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.78-4 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

    If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-10-13. 🎊

    After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

    • External issue reporter
    • Contributor that fixed the issue
    • Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

    For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

    • @robertKozik does not require payment (Contractor)
    • @s-alves10 requires payment offer (Contributor)

    As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

    • Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
    • Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty
  10. melvin-bot commented on Oct 6, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

    • [@robertKozik] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
    • [@robertKozik] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
    • [@robertKozik] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
    • [@robertKozik] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
    • [@robertKozik] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
    • [@johncschuster] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
  11. johncschuster commented on Oct 16, 2023

    @johncschuster
    Contributor

    Payment has been issued to @s-alves10

  12. johncschuster commented on Oct 16, 2023

    @johncschuster
    Contributor

    @robertKozik can you complete the BZ Checklist when you get a moment? Thank you!

  13. robertKozik commented on Oct 16, 2023

    @robertKozik
    Contributor
    • [@robertKozik] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: I cannot find any particular PR which introduce it. I believe it was overlooked during implementation
    • [@robertKozik] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment: N/A
    • [@robertKozik] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion: N/A
    • [@robertKozik] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug. I don't think we need it here. This bug didn't block any crucial user flow
    • [@robertKozik] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again. N/A

    CC. @johncschuster

  14. johncschuster commented on Oct 19, 2023

    @johncschuster
    Contributor

    Sweet! Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to productionBugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.DailyKSv2EngineeringExternalAdded to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions