Skip to content

Track external secret-manager integrations (1Password, Bitwarden, Vault, …) #168

Open

Description

@ChrisonSimtian

Loose tracking issue for external secret managers as candidate value-provider integrations once the v12 plugin SDK lands. Not a commitment to build any — a list to point at when people ask "can Fallout pull secrets from X?".

Background

ADR-0002 fixes the secret resolution chain:

CLI → env var → value-provider attribute → encrypted parameters file → CredentialStore → prompt

The third step is the integration point for external stores. One precedent in-tree:

  • AzureKeyVaultSecretAttribute at src/Fallout.Common/Tools/AzureKeyVault/ — resolves [Parameter, Secret] values by fetching from a Key Vault at startup.

Anything fitting the same shape — a remote store reachable by API at build start, returning a string — can ride the same extension point. The v12 plugin SDK (milestone #7) is the natural delivery vehicle: each integration is one plugin, owned by whoever needs it, no upstream maintenance burden.

Candidate integrations (alphabetical, not prioritised)

Tool Why track it Auth model Notes
1Password Connect / Service Accounts Common in product/eng orgs; the maintainer's workplace uses it Service-account token + Connect URL, or op CLI session CLI is lowest-friction; service-account API is CI-friendly
AWS Secrets Manager Default for AWS stacks IAM role / access keys Mature SDK; trivial wrapper
Azure Key Vault ✅ already exists Managed identity / service principal Reference implementation
Bitwarden Secrets Manager Maintainer's preference; good for OSS / small teams Access token + org ID Distinct from the Password Manager — Secrets Manager is the CI-facing product
Doppler Popular with smaller teams; nice DX Service token Single-binary CLI, simple REST API
GCP Secret Manager Default for GCP stacks Service-account JSON / workload identity Symmetric with AWS / Azure
HashiCorp Vault The "serious" enterprise option AppRole / token / OIDC Most complex auth; biggest payoff
Infisical Open-source Doppler alternative; growing Service token Worth watching

What the framework needs

Already in place:

  • ✅ ValueInjectionAttributeBase — the base each provider attribute extends (cf. ParameterAttribute, AzureKeyVaultSecretAttribute).
  • ✅ Resolution chain documented in ADR-0002.
  • ✅ [Secret] marker for log scrubbing (modulo the masking verification still open against the ADR review).

Plausibly needed:

  • A small shared "secret value provider" base interface to cut boilerplate.
  • Conventions for caching values within one build invocation (some stores are slow / rate-limited).
  • A consistent error mode when a store is unreachable (fail-fast vs fall-through).

Scope

  • In: keep the list current, accept suggestions, note community interest.
  • Out: committing to any integration. Each gets its own issue + PR when someone builds it.

Closing condition: when ≥3 ship as v12 plugins and the pattern is proven. Until then, leave open.

Related

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or requesttarget/vNextTargets the next calendar-version

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions