You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Release process improvement ideas/observations from pdp v3.5.0 #307
Initial @BigLep observations from reading through the script:
Testing in foc-devnet
We llist a step for testing the upgrade steps in foc-devnet, but we also need to make sure that new functionality works in foc-devnet. That's a missing step, and was something that was holding up this release.
If the release tag must match the exact on-chain bytecode, tag the deploy commit before changelog-only closeout changes. Otherwise, tag the finalized release-notes commit and record the implementation deploy commit separately.
Why is this an "if"? The release process should make clear what path we follow and be documented as such.
Suggested release tag
Why do we say suggested? We should just state what the release tag is.
x.y.z
We have that throughout. Maybe have a step to actually fill that in to avoid confusion?
Sections in general
I think it would be good to add some hide/show toggles so can collapse
@Kubuxu : I assume you'll add your dump about this process in general at and potential alternatives to foc-devnet here. There are general thoughts about foc-devnet future direction in FilOzone/foc-devnet#139
changed the title [-]Release process improvement ideas/observations from v3.5.0[/-][+]Release process improvement ideas/observations from pdp v3.5.0[/+]on Aug 31, 2026
Activity
BigLep commentedon Aug 22, 2026
Initial @BigLep observations from reading through the script:
We llist a step for testing the upgrade steps in foc-devnet, but we also need to make sure that new functionality works in foc-devnet. That's a missing step, and was something that was holding up this release.
Why is this an "if"? The release process should make clear what path we follow and be documented as such.
Why do we say suggested? We should just state what the release tag is.
We have that throughout. Maybe have a step to actually fill that in to avoid confusion?
I think it would be good to add some hide/show toggles so can collapse
BigLep commentedon Aug 22, 2026
@Kubuxu : I assume you'll add your dump about this process in general at and potential alternatives to foc-devnet here. There are general thoughts about foc-devnet future direction in FilOzone/foc-devnet#139
[-]Release process improvement ideas/observations from v3.5.0[/-][+]Release process improvement ideas/observations from pdp v3.5.0[/+]