Repository navigation
Collaboration & Orchestration #435
Description
Feature Request: Collaboration & Orchestration
Problem Description
Spec writing is inherently collaborative, but current tools are often single-player or rely on generic git conflicts. Complex specs may benefit from multiple AI "eyes" (agents) to review or brainstorm.
Proposed Solution
- Multi-user Workspaces: Shared views, RBAC, and real-time edits.
- Discussion Threads: Google-Docs-style comments on spec sections.
- Multi-Agent Orchestration: Parallel pipelines where different agents review security, performance, or logic of a spec.
- Consensus Building: Aggregating results from multiple models.
Benefits
- Better specs through diverse input (human and AI).
- Streamlined team workflows.
- Higher confidence in spec quality.
Industry Inspiration
- Traycer: "Multi-Agent Orchestration Framework" - parallel planning and consensus.
Activity
clay-good commentedon Aug 6, 2026
Thanks for raising this, @mhingston 🙏
This is about Multi-user workspaces/RBAC, inline comments, multi-agent orchestration, consensus. — an open-ended feature/design idea rather than a discrete, PR-actionable bug or task. To honor it properly we've moved it to Discussions, where it can keep evolving with community input and you can re-engage anytime:
👉 #1546
The original issue (and any comments) stays here for the record, so nothing is lost — please continue the conversation in the discussion above. Closing the issue in favor of that thread.