You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
High NDR values when quantifying transposable elements in exosomes #536
Thank you for making such an amazing tool available!
I'm analyzing ONT-cDNA data of porcine exosomes with Bambu for downstream transposable element (TE) quantification, and consistently get a high recommended NDR (~0.685) with both the pre-trained human model and sample-specific training.
Could you please advise:
Should I set NDR = 1 and min.txScore.singleExon = 0 for downstream TE overlap analysis (e.g., with RepeatMasker)?
Would you recommend sticking with the human model in this case?
I would greatly appreciate your thoughts and suggestions.
Setting NDR = 1 will report all transcripts, including those with low confidence, which I generally don’t recommend. However, for transposable elements (which often include single-exon transcripts), I suggest using min.txScore.singleExon = 0. You can then use the resulting txScore to manually evaluate their confidence.
Not sure about the differences between human and porcine annotations: I recommend using a porcine closely related annotation to train the model before inputting it into Bambu for the best results.
Activity
SuiYue-2308 commentedon Apr 8, 2026
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply.
Setting NDR = 1 will report all transcripts, including those with low confidence, which I generally don’t recommend. However, for transposable elements (which often include single-exon transcripts), I suggest using min.txScore.singleExon = 0. You can then use the resulting txScore to manually evaluate their confidence.
Not sure about the differences between human and porcine annotations: I recommend using a porcine closely related annotation to train the model before inputting it into Bambu for the best results.
Best regards,
Yue