Scientific paper proposal: An Empirical Evaluation of Using Large Language Models for Automated Unit Test Generation, week 2 - #2940
Open
AlexWigren wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
Collaborator
|
The checks fail because of our issues. I am looking at it. |
Collaborator
|
Closing and reopening this PR to retrigger CI. |
algomaster99
requested changes
Aug 28, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Assignment Proposal
Title
An Empirical Evaluation of Using Large Language Models for Automated Unit Test Generation
Names and KTH ID
Deadline
Category
Description
The paper selected was published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Unit tests are a key part of ensuring that produced code for software is correct and functional. Manually creating these test have however historically been a very labor intensive task. Recent developments in the field of Large Language Models (LLM) has rapidly expanded its usefulness in various fields of software development, including the automated generation of unit tests. This paper by Schäfer et. al serves as an empirical analysis of the effectiveness of LLM technology for the aforementioned purpose. Concretely, the paper introduces what the authors call "TESTPILOT", an adaptive tool to automatically generate unit tests for JavaScript projects. The authors use several different models in their research and find results that seem to imply that the effectiveness of the approach is influenced by the size and training set of the LLM, rather than just the choice of specific model.
During our presentation we aim to explore how this technology works, briefly go over found results and compare this approach of unit test generation to other approaches that exist.
Relevance
Automated generation of unit tests is a key part of DevOps as it helps to save time (developers spend less time creating tests and more time creating deliverable code) and ensure correctness (errors are more likely to be found and corrected before reaching the end user). It is therefore highly relevant to explore this topic further and compare this new approach to other available methods.