You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Integrate Baseline VLM and Hierarchical Models - P6 #1587
Is your feature request related to a problem? If so, Please describe.
There were two final architectures that we would like to see included in VIAME: VLM and hierarchical models.
Describe the solution you'd like
Modernize detector architectures - integrate baseline VLM and hierarchical models
FYI, We have some model training pipelines and weights for hierarchical inference on the GFISHER data already. The major caveat there w.r.t. the UI/UX is that the output prob vector conflicts with standard postprocessing of "flat" predictions - e.g. P("Animalia") is always strictly greater than P("Felis catus") because all Felidae are Animalia by definition, so doing things like "taking the largest probability class" will always select "Biota" and never anything else. Happy to discuss further.
Activity
csbrown-noaa commentedon Apr 22, 2026
FYI, We have some model training pipelines and weights for hierarchical inference on the GFISHER data already. The major caveat there w.r.t. the UI/UX is that the output prob vector conflicts with standard postprocessing of "flat" predictions - e.g. P("Animalia") is always strictly greater than P("Felis catus") because all Felidae are Animalia by definition, so doing things like "taking the largest probability class" will always select "Biota" and never anything else. Happy to discuss further.
PaulHax commentedon Aug 21, 2026
Hi y'all. Some related "higherachrical type" UI work is coming together here:
#1867
The type hierarchy, like a domain to species taxonomy, can be defined in an imported kwcoco file: