Skip to content

docs(transfer): clarify WSM single-view support - #335

Open
sylvesterkaczmarek wants to merge 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
sylvesterkaczmarek:docs/clarify-wsm-single-view-209
Open

sylvesterkaczmarek wants to merge 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
sylvesterkaczmarek:docs/clarify-wsm-single-view-209

Conversation

@sylvesterkaczmarek

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • clarify that world-scenario-map transfer is supported by Cosmos3-Nano and Cosmos3-Super
  • document that the current transfer path generates a single RGB view per WSM control video
  • distinguish multi-control transfer from synchronized multi-camera generation

Why

Issue #209 asks whether the released Cosmos3 models support world-scenario-map transfer and whether the MADS seven-camera setup implies joint multi-view generation. A maintainer confirmed that WSM transfer is supported, while the current release supports single-view generation only.

The transfer README already documents WSM and multi-control inputs, but it does not state this single-view limitation explicitly. This small clarification puts the maintainer-confirmed behaviour next to the relevant controls and avoids ambiguity between multi-control and multi-view generation.

Validation

Documentation-only change. Cross-checked against the existing WSM transfer example and the maintainer response in #209.

Closes #209

@sylvesterkaczmarek
sylvesterkaczmarek force-pushed the docs/clarify-wsm-single-view-209 branch from 1f5e31e to c87592d Compare September 30, 2026 17:27
@sylvesterkaczmarek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Refreshed this docs PR onto current main today. It is now 0 commits behind and mergeable, and the diff remains limited to the intended documentation file. This has been quiet for over two weeks. Could a maintainer please review/merge it, or let me know if any wording change is needed?

Refreshed onto current upstream.

Signed-off-by: Sylvester Kaczmarek <16242628+sylvesterkaczmarek@users.noreply.github.com>
@sylvesterkaczmarek
sylvesterkaczmarek force-pushed the docs/clarify-wsm-single-view-209 branch from c87592d to 9f754fb Compare September 30, 2026 17:41
@sylvesterkaczmarek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Following up on the single-view transfer clarification. Could a maintainer review it and approve the waiting workflow?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Question: Multi-view Driving Transfer and world-scenario-map control support

1 participant