[KateCourt]

Description

Added a 'Civic Impact' section to README to invite RSE to consider any opportunities to widen the repository reach and impact. For example, this might be an opportunity to highlight a user group that might be interested or even to draw the team's attention to any parts of the code you think might be useful for reuse in the future.

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

How has this been tested?

No tests required

Checklist:

No checks required.

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

What should reviewers look for?

Consider if this would be useful to include.

[Robin-Wardle]

@KateCourt are you waiting for a review for this or can it just be merged?