Repository navigation
Change meaning of acronym OSMP to "open-simulation-model-packaging" #67
Description
Describe the problem
I think the current acronym "osi-sensor-model-packaging" is confusing since not only sensor models (but also traffic participant models) can be packaged since OSI 3.3 / OSMP 1.1.
I suggest to consistently change the name to "open-simulation-model-packaging" instead.
Activity
pmai commentedon Jun 16, 2021
I'd be in favor of that, however would lead to repo renaming, etc.
tbleher commentedon Mar 21, 2022
Stumbled across this problem today, when trying to explain what OSMP is. I like the new expansion by @clemenshabedank . Suggestion for a first step: change the description of the repo (needs an admin, I guess). This is important since it is visible also on https://github.com/OpenSimulationInterface (in fact, the text "This document specifies the ways in which sensor models are to be packaged for use in simulation environments with FMI 2.0" is there twice). I think changing this (e.g. to "in which sensor models or agent models are packaged") should be relatively uncontroversial.
Additionally, change the name and description in https://github.com/OpenSimulationInterface/osi-sensor-model-packaging/blob/master/README.md. I can create a patch if there is rough consensus that the name should be changed.
clemenshabedank commentedon Apr 6, 2022
Hey @tbleher I will make a PR today! Will set you as a reviewer then...