2.0 wishlist #259

Activity

1. jameshilliard commented on Oct 3, 2022

   

   jameshilliard

   on Oct 3, 2022

   Last edited by jameshilliard

   Contributor

   More actions

   • Remove build_rust subcommand (the setup.py entry point is deprecated, so no need to support it IMO)

   I would recommend holding off on this as it's not currently possible to migrate setuptools setup.py package build infrastructure to pep517 package build infrastructure due to setuptools pep517 support effectively requiring setup.py build infrastructure itself for bootstrapping.

   Currently setup.py builds are still supported in the latest setuptools release, IMO we should probably support them here until we start requiring a version of setuptools that no longer supports setup.py style builds.
2. davidhewitt commented on Oct 4, 2022

   

   davidhewitt

   on Oct 4, 2022

   MemberAuthor

   More actions

   Thanks for the heads up! I'm in no rush to push forward with a 2.0 release, so potentially we can just wait for upstream before we consider a 2.0 in that case.
3. jameshilliard commented on Oct 4, 2024

   

   jameshilliard

   on Oct 4, 2024

   Contributor

   More actions

   • Remove Binding.Exec (just use RustBin).

   I think for embedding binaries in site-packages like in selenium we still may need to keep Binding.Exec as RustBin is only for stuff that goes in the scripts path AFAIU.