Add return value to Slack operators for XCom - #63397
Merged
Merged
Conversation
yuseok89
marked this pull request as ready for review
March 12, 2026 01:16
vincbeck
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are use cases where the message ID(
ts) is needed after posting. This change makes the Slack operator return the API response so downstream tasks can access it via XCom.Users who do not want the XCom response can set the BaseOperator parameter
do_xcom_pushtoFalse.Screenshot
SlackAPIPostOperator
SlackAPIFileOperator
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
{pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.