Skip to content

[parquet] Update parquet-testing revision for ALP tests - #10786

Merged
alamb merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
sdf-jkl:update-parquet-testing-alp
Aug 25, 2026
Merged

[parquet] Update parquet-testing revision for ALP tests#10786
alamb merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
sdf-jkl:update-parquet-testing-alp

Conversation

@sdf-jkl

@sdf-jkl sdf-jkl commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Which issue does this PR close?

  • Closes #NNN.

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?

Are there any user-facing changes?

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the parquet Changes to the parquet crate label Aug 21, 2026
@sdf-jkl
sdf-jkl marked this pull request as ready for review August 22, 2026 06:16
@sdf-jkl

sdf-jkl commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@alamb PTAL

@sdf-jkl

sdf-jkl commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Jefffrey @alamb :shipit:

@alamb
alamb merged commit 0e58155 into apache:main Aug 25, 2026
18 checks passed
@alamb

alamb commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @sdf-jkl and @etseidl

alamb added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2026
…ts (#10871)

# Which issue does this PR close?

N/A

# Rationale for this change

Backport #10786 to the
`59_maintenance` branch -- so I don't hit an error validating the
release
-
#10738 (comment)

# What changes are included in this PR?

Cherry-pick of 0e58155 (#10786):
1. Update the `parquet-testing` submodule to `09f3cdbd`
2. Add the new `variants` entry to the known files list in the
`bad_data` test

The submodule pointer had a trivial conflict with the revision on
`59_maintenance` (`ffdcbb5e`); it was resolved by taking the newer
revision from #10786, of which `ffdcbb5e` is an ancestor.

# Are these changes tested?

By CI

# Are there any user-facing changes?

No

Co-authored-by: Kosta Tarasov <33369833+sdf-jkl@users.noreply.github.com>
@Jefffrey Jefffrey added the development-process Related to development process of arrow-rs label Aug 27, 2026
Rich-T-kid pushed a commit to Rich-T-kid/arrow-rs that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2026
# Which issue does this PR close?

<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases.
You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax.
-->

- Closes #NNN.

# Rationale for this change

<!--
Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly
in the issue then this section is not needed.
Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand
your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
-->

# What changes are included in this PR?

<!--
There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it
is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this
PR.
-->

# Are these changes tested?

<!--
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code

If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example,
are they covered by existing tests)?

If this PR claims a performance improvement, please include evidence
such as benchmark results.
-->

# Are there any user-facing changes?

<!--
If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be
updated before approving the PR.

If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please call them out.
-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

development-process Related to development process of arrow-rs parquet Changes to the parquet crate

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants