Do we need to escape search string as it's used in regexp? Wondering what's the result of `contains("abcdefg", ".*")`

[alamb]

          Do we need to escape search string as it's used in regexp? Wondering what's the result of `contains("abcdefg", ".*")`

Originally posted by @waynexia in #10879 (comment)

[alamb]

cc @Lordworms

[Lordworms]

Sorry for the late review since I was busy this week. In the beginning, I was just trying to keep the same format as other ScalarUDF which utilize arrow-rs methods to implement functionality so I just chose arrow::reglike. I can fix it to use str.contains

[alamb]

I was just trying to keep the same format as other ScalarUDF which utilize arrow-rs methods to implement functionality so I just chose arrow::reglike.

Makes sense. I think in this case, however, the function shouldn't actually have regexp support, so it would be better to use str.contains

I can fix it to use str.contains

Thank you!

[waynexia]

Thanks @Lordworms. I'm thinking about @alamb's idea #10879 (comment), which only implements contains as a placeholder for translating/planning. And it would finally become some other thing like LIKE after the optimization phase. A similar thing is Expr::Wildcard, it's to reflect * from SQL but doesn't have a corresponding physical expr.

[alamb]

One benefit of using LIKE is that it already has a highly optimized arrow implementation (as in will actually use substring if the patttern looks like substr% etc).

[Lordworms]

I'll refactor it to use LIKE