HDDS-16082. [Ozone versioning] [T5] SUSPENDED semantics - #10955
Open
symious wants to merge 23 commits into
Open
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…equest Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Key names in OBJECT_STORE buckets contain '/' verbatim, so a '/' separator interleaves a key's versions with those of keys nested under it, breaking the single-seek promotion and the merged ListObjectVersions order. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Rename NULL_VERSION_ID to UNSET_VERSION_ID: 0 is the unset value of the optional proto field, not the id of the null version. A null version carries a normally generated id and is identified by isNullVersion, so that a null created between two versioned writes orders as the middle version rather than the oldest. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The reclaim branches skipped S3-versioned buckets only because the legacy isVersionEnabled flag is kept in sync with an ENABLED status. Depend on the status directly, so that dropping that sync cannot strand a version record by reclaiming the blocks it still refers to. OMKeyCommitRequestWithFSO is left alone: isS3VersioningEnabled() requires the OBJECT_STORE layout, so the check is structurally false on the FSO path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
KeyArgs gains versionId and nullVersion: a null version carries a normally generated id like any other version, so the null slot needs a selector of its own rather than a reserved id. The current version is checked before the versionedKeyTable, so naming it costs no extra read, and the null slot is found by a bounded scan of the key's version prefix. Addressing a delete marker by version is reported as KEY_IS_DELETE_MARKER rather than KEY_NOT_FOUND: S3 answers 405 for it and 404 only for a read that lands on a current marker without naming a version. The status mapping itself belongs to the gateway. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
DELETE ?versionId= is the only delete that destroys data on a versioned bucket: the version leaves the versionedKeyTable and its blocks go to the deletedTable, which stays the single path through which version blocks are reclaimed. The null slot is addressed by attribute, so it is found by the same bounded prefix scan the read path uses. Addressing the current version is rejected for now: removing it has to promote the next-newest version to keep the keyTable authoritative, which T4.3 adds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
keyTable holds the current version of every key that still has one, so removing the current version has to hand the place over: one seek on the key's version prefix yields the newest remaining version, which moves back into the keyTable in the same WriteBatch as the delete. The record travels unchanged - promotion is positional, and a version keeps the identity it was created with. When no version survives, the key disappears entirely. Deleting a current delete marker this way is exactly S3's restore-an-object flow: the version the marker superseded becomes current again. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…nded Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Please only review commits starts with "T5".
What is the link to the Apache JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-16082
How was this patch tested?
unit test