Skip to content

[SPARK-53209][YARN][FOLLOWUP] Move spark.yarn.am.limitActiveProcessorCount.enabled to yarn module#56541

Draft
pan3793 wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
pan3793:SPARK-53209-followup
Draft

[SPARK-53209][YARN][FOLLOWUP] Move spark.yarn.am.limitActiveProcessorCount.enabled to yarn module#56541
pan3793 wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
pan3793:SPARK-53209-followup

Conversation

@pan3793

@pan3793 pan3793 commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Move definition of config spark.yarn.am.limitActiveProcessorCount.enabled from the core to yarn module

Why are the changes needed?

The YARN AM config should exist on the yarn module, not core.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Pass GHA.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If RC3 is the final, this PR should have a different JIRA ID. Could you ask Huaxin if she is going to fail RC3 and will get your PR for next RC4? Otherwise, this should have a new JIRA ID to be safe.

@pan3793

pan3793 commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Since SPARK-57452 has been raised as a blocker, RC3 is likely to fail. I will wait for the final decision.

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun marked this pull request as draft June 16, 2026 16:21
@dongjoon-hyun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thank you for your decision. I'll convert this as Draft to prevent accidental merging.

@dongjoon-hyun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Due to the [FOLLOWUP], unlike other PRs, this PR should not land on even master branch without RC3 result.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants