test(me): Remove claude-isolated-test from workflow commands check

[baleen37]

Summary

• Fix typo in web-researcher agent description (</commentery> → </commentary>)
• Fix all markdownlint issues (line length, blank lines, code fence language)
• Remove claude-isolated-test.md from me plugin test checklist (file no longer exists)

Test plan

• All pre-commit hooks pass
• All BATS tests pass
• Branch merges cleanly with $BASE
• markdownlint validation passes

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Improved web-researcher agent documentation with enhanced formatting and structure
  • Added structured example sections with explicit context and step-by-step guidance
  • Enhanced research process with numbered steps and clearer formatting
  • Added emphasis on tools and resources for research operations

• Tests

  • Adjusted test assertions for workflow command verification

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PR refactors the web-researcher agent documentation with improved formatting and structural clarity, including expanded descriptions, explicit example blocks, and enhanced procedural sections. Additionally, a test assertion for claude-isolated-test.md is removed from the test suite.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Rewrite plugins/me/agents/web-researcher.md	Expanded and reformatted description; added structured example blocks; enhanced Core Principles and Research Process sections with improved line breaks and formatting; expanded Output Quality Checklist. Changes are stylistic and clarify textual guidance without modifying executable logic.
Test Updates plugins/me/tests/me-specific.bats	Removed test assertion checking for existence of claude-isolated-test.md file in the command verification suite.

Possibly Related PRs

• baleen37/claude-plugins#295: The removed test assertion for claude-isolated-test.md directly relates to this PR's renaming updates for the claude-isolated-test skill.

Poem

🐰 A rabbit hops through docs so fine,
With structured examples, all in line,
The researcher's guide now shines so bright,
While tests adjust to what is right,
Format and clarity, a joyful sight! ✨

Estimated Code Review Effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately summarizes the main change: removing claude-isolated-test from the workflow commands check in the test file.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/web-researcher-typo

---

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

🧹 Recent nitpick comments

plugins/me/agents/web-researcher.md (1)

58-63: Consider varying the repeated “What …” bullet openings.

Minor style tweak to reduce repetition in the “Before searching, clarify” list.

✏️ Possible rewording

- What specific information is needed?
- What context (technology, version, use case) matters?
- What would a complete answer look like?
+ Specific information required?
+ Relevant context (technology, version, use case)?
+ Definition of a complete answer?

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}