docs: add Modal provider setup (#39710)

[DevFlex-AI]

Issue for this PR

Closes #

Type of change

• Bug fix
• New feature
• Refactor / code improvement
• Documentation

What does this PR do?

Please provide a description of the issue, the changes you made to fix it, and why they work. It is expected that you understand why your changes work and if you do not understand why at least say as much so a maintainer knows how much to value the PR.

If you paste a large clearly AI generated description here your PR may be IGNORED or CLOSED!

How did you verify your code works?

Screenshots / recordings

If this is a UI change, please include a screenshot or recording.

Checklist

• I have tested my changes locally
• I have not included unrelated changes in this PR

If you do not follow this template your PR will be automatically rejected.

---

^{Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need. Autofix is enabled.}

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@DevFlex-AI, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 23 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 5f36e00c-bfac-4f8c-9bbf-bb32f8470325

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 70d5a6c and ceb4890.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• packages/web/src/content/docs/providers.mdx

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[vercel]

@devennavani is attempting to deploy a commit to the adevloper152's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[github-actions]

This PR doesn't fully meet our contributing guidelines and PR template.

What needs to be fixed:

• No "Type of change" checkbox is checked. Please select at least one.
• "How did you verify your code works?" section is empty. Please explain how you tested.
• Not all checklist items are checked. Please confirm you have tested locally and have not included unrelated changes.

Please edit this PR description to address the above within 2 hours, or it will be automatically closed.

If you believe this was flagged incorrectly, please let a maintainer know.

[github-actions]

This PR doesn't fully meet our contributing guidelines and PR template.

What needs to be fixed:

• No "Type of change" checkbox is checked. Please select at least one.
• "How did you verify your code works?" section is empty. Please explain how you tested.
• Not all checklist items are checked. Please confirm you have tested locally and have not included unrelated changes.

Please edit this PR description to address the above within 2 hours, or it will be automatically closed.

If you believe this was flagged incorrectly, please let a maintainer know.

[github-actions]

The following comment was made by an LLM, it may be inaccurate: