Prefixed macros with BOOST - #411
Conversation
|
@Thihup Thank you for your contribution, awesome! Please, refrain from promptly reacting to the further @ned14's suggestions for a moment. |
|
Hi @mloskot! I'll wait to see if it's really necessary change the auxiliary files. Sorry for the inconvenience. |
No need, no problem. I just didn't want you to keep doing work unnecessarily. |
|
@Thihup I'd suggest to focus this PR on renaming C++ Review of the auxiliary files is a good idea, but I'd prefer to do it in separate PR, as per my #410 (comment) |
|
Sounds good to me |
|
Should I prefix the macros in tests too? |
|
For tests it's up to you, but for easy checking that you're good it's probably easiest. |
Which macros you mean? |
|
GIL_Tests (test/legacy/performance.cpp | recreate_image.cpp) I think there is no others cpp to edit but those. If it's not necessary I think it's ready to merge. |
This is not an explicit This is part of Legacy Tests which are assumed promised as left untouched as per test/legacy/README.md. However, I'd suggest to rename the two This should avoid confusing the macro check tooling.
Yes, this can be prefixed indeed. Good catch. |
|
@Thihup Thank you very much for your help! |
Description
Prefixes some macros with BOOST
References
This pull request closes #410