fix(calendar): preserve chronological placement with Bases sorting - #2318
Merged
callumalpass merged 1 commit intoSep 13, 2026
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A Base sort currently puts task result ranks ahead of calendar start times. In agenda view, this can place an evening task before an earlier appointment that has no Base result index.
Keep start time and all-day placement first, then use Base rank to order tasks at the same placement. Calendars without an explicit Base sort keep their existing order. This follows up on #1411.
Validation: the agenda sorting suite passes (4 tests), including the real FullCalendar comparator with morning/evening tasks and an intervening appointment. ESLint, the TypeScript/build check, and a reload in a disposable Obsidian vault also passed.