Repository navigation
Dead letter queue (DLQ) as option for retry expiration - #366
Closed
Antony Stubbs (astubbs) wants to merge 30 commits into
Closed
Antony Stubbs (astubbs) wants to merge 30 commits into
Antony Stubbs (astubbs) wants to merge 30 commits into
Conversation
…eatures/retry-exception
…ption # Conflicts: # parallel-consumer-core/src/main/java/io/confluent/parallelconsumer/internal/AbstractParallelEoSStreamProcessor.java # parallel-consumer-core/src/test/resources/logback-test.xml
Antony Stubbs (astubbs)
changed the base branch from
features/retry-exception
to
master
July 27, 2022 11:56
Antony Stubbs (astubbs)
force-pushed
the
master
branch
from
August 2, 2022 11:07
c097a37 to
3e0c5fd
Compare
Contributor
|
Closing - Stale. |
This was referenced Aug 6, 2026
Antony Stubbs (astubbs)
added a commit
to astubbs/parallel-consumer
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2026
…duce-send failure Raised while reading back the #261 fix. The surviving throw in ProducerManager's send callback is reachable in ordinary operation - client-side rejection of a result record the user's function returned, RecordTooLargeException being the case the new IT exercises - so it is an expected state, not an internal fault. Calling it InternalRuntimeException makes every reader re-derive that whole chain (which path is reachable, why the async one is not, what actually throws) before concluding it is ordinary failure handling. That derivation was done from source and kafka-clients bytecode during review and was recorded nowhere. Preferred fix is non-breaking: throw a specific subclass so existing catch (InternalRuntimeException) keeps working while the type states the situation. Renaming the base type would be user-visible and is called out as belonging in the breaking-changes section instead. Also corrects this note's own account of confluentinc#291. It is a PR, not an issue, it implements confluentinc#242, and both concern exceptions the USER FUNCTION throws - not send-failure classification. Reading them as cover for send retries was wrong; that work sits under #141 / #149, epic #239. Records that both are already accounted for, so neither gets re-mirrored: confluentinc#291 was closed unmerged on 2023-06-15, in the PR half of the administrative sweep, and is carried in upstream-map.yaml under sweep-2023-admin-closure - it has no dedicated fork issue only because that cohort mirrored the 28 swept issues, with the 35 swept PRs held in the map. confluentinc#242 is not sweep-affected at all, closed as completed by astubbs in 2022. Notes the one real gap: #239's "Prior work" cites confluentinc#366 from that same cohort but not confluentinc#291, which is equally prior art for the retry half of that epic. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Aug 14, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description...
Checklist
Blocked by: