Skip to content

Consider processing nested defaultValues #112

Description

@patroza

e.g you add a new object, add a defaultValue for it, but then you add a new field to it.
in this case, the data already has the object, just incomplete. we could consider doing nested default values, I think Cosmos does this internally too.

        defaultValues: {
          additionalInfo: {
            logo: null,
            description: null // new field
          }
        }
  ParseError: ReadonlyArray<(Security (Encoded side) <-> Security)>
  └─ [0]
     └─ (Security (Encoded side) <-> Security)
        └─ Encoded side transformation failure
           └─ Security (Encoded side)
              └─ ["additionalInfo"]
                 └─ { readonly logo: NonEmptyString255 | null; readonly description: (Translated (Encoded side) <-> Translated) | null }
                    └─ ["description"]
                       └─ is missing

the current workaround would be to use a more customised/advanced jitM function, but it is not as useful as defaultValues in other ways.

No activity

Activity on this issue will appear here.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions