You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Noop on no failure #605 — It tracks earlier behavior in the same detective flow and linked external PR context, which helps explain prior verbosity/no-op adjustments.
tl;dr: pr-actions-detective is already deduping/no-oping correctly for no-failure cases; the remaining gap for this issue is response verbosity, which is currently driven by a rigid required comment template. I recommend tightening the prompt format with explicit brevity budgets.
Recommendation
Update .github/workflows/gh-aw-pr-actions-detective.md Step 3 to require a minimal response shape with hard limits (for example: TL;DR ≤ 1 sentence, Remediation ≤ 3 bullets, details ≤ 5 bullets total, log excerpt ≤ 8 lines), then run make compile so lock files inherit the change.
Findings
The detective prompt currently mandates a multi-section structure and says “Use this exact shape,” which encourages long comments:
Activity
github-actions commentedon Mar 13, 2026
3 related issues
What is this? | From workflow: Trigger Duplicate Issue Detector
Give us feedback! React with 🚀 if perfect, 👍 if helpful, 👎 if not.
github-actions commentedon Mar 13, 2026
tl;dr:
pr-actions-detectiveis already deduping/no-oping correctly for no-failure cases; the remaining gap for this issue is response verbosity, which is currently driven by a rigid required comment template. I recommend tightening the prompt format with explicit brevity budgets.Recommendation
Update
.github/workflows/gh-aw-pr-actions-detective.mdStep 3 to require a minimal response shape with hard limits (for example: TL;DR ≤ 1 sentence, Remediation ≤ 3 bullets, details ≤ 5 bullets total, log excerpt ≤ 8 lines), then runmake compileso lock files inherit the change.Findings
.github/workflows/gh-aw-pr-actions-detective.md:132-166TL;DR, expandedRemediation, and detailed sections (Root Cause,Evidence,Validation,Follow-up)..github/workflows/gh-aw-fragments/safe-output-add-comment-pr-hide-older.md:3-9(max: 1,hide-older-comments: true).github/workflows/gh-aw-fragments/safe-output-add-comment-pr-hide-older.md:14(body max 65,536 chars).github/workflows/gh-aw-pr-actions-detective.lock.yml:761("maxLength": 65000)#605(open),#620(closed),#644(closed),#609(merged),#596(merged).Verification
I verified the current behavior/instructions with:
Observed output confirms:
gh-aw-pr-actions-fixer.md:138-142).Detailed Action Plan
.github/workflows/gh-aw-pr-actions-detective.mdStep 3:TL;DR,Remediation, optional<details>) so downstream readers still get consistent navigation.make compilemax: 1, hide older comments still active).Related Items
.github/workflows/gh-aw-pr-actions-detective.md:132-166.github/workflows/gh-aw-fragments/safe-output-add-comment-pr-hide-older.md:3-9.github/workflows/gh-aw-pr-actions-detective.lock.yml:761What is this? | From workflow: Trigger Issue Triage
Give us feedback! React with 🚀 if perfect, 👍 if helpful, 👎 if not.