Skip to content

ci : update CPU job assignments - #31136

Merged
ggerganov merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
gg/ci-cpi-jobs
Oct 25, 2026
Merged

ggerganov merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
gg/ci-cpi-jobs

Conversation

@ggerganov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Overview

The 2x T4 runners have very slow CPUs, so they are not suitable for CPU-intensive jobs:

https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/actions/runs/40124775042/job/120963754573

Removed their CPU label and added the CPU label to the following 2 jobs:

  • CI (self-hosted CPU backend) / cpu-x64-high-perf
  • CI (sanitize) / ctest (UNDEFINED, self-hosted, X64, Linux)

This way they no longer run on the T4 runners. The T4 runners will now execute just the Vulkan jobs + lightweight jobs such as build-cmake-pkg.yml.

The CPU-intensive jobs will run on the sg-hl1-ci-nvidia-vulkan-cm and hopefully next week on the new AMD runners. We can also try to enable them on the new DGX Spark runners - need to add the CPU label to those.

Requirements

@ggerganov
ggerganov requested a review from a team as a code owner October 25, 2026 07:54
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the devops improvements to build systems and github actions label Oct 25, 2026

@CISC CISC left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Speaking of which, the strix-halo runner appears to have been offline for a few days. cc/ @jimw567

@ggerganov
ggerganov merged commit 344be0a into master Oct 25, 2026
14 checks passed
@ggerganov
ggerganov deleted the gg/ci-cpi-jobs branch October 25, 2026 08:35
auRose94 pushed a commit to auRose94/llama.cpp that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2026
edwardyoon pushed a commit to edwardyoon/focus-llama that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

devops improvements to build systems and github actions

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants