You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[uk-ai-resilience] Alert-dismissal hygiene gap: 3 CodeQL alerts remain open despite closed/remediated tracking issues (Tier C) #57982
Tier: C — Restricted Pending Review (process gap, not live code risk)
Finding: Three open CodeQL alerts (#669/#668 in pkg/workflow/graders_config.go, #667 in pkg/cli/add_package_manifest_includes.go, #653 actionlint workflow-out-of-context) each have a pre-existing tracking issue (#57472, #54037, #57728 respectively) asserting the underlying finding is a false positive or already remediated in code — yet all three alerts remain open/undismissed in code scanning. This is a recurring alert-lifecycle hygiene gap distinct from the individual code findings themselves: it inflates the open-alert count, obscures true remediation status in dashboards, and increases MTTR-proxy metrics without reflecting live risk.
Risk-scoring breakdown (aggregate across the 3 alerts)
Dimension
Rating
Exposure amplification
Low
Patchability
High (fix already believed complete per linked issues)
Detectability
High (alerts are visible; the gap is in closure, not detection)
Operational fragility
Low
Ownership confidence
Low — no CODEOWNERS file to route alert-dismissal responsibility
Remediation action
For each of #57472, #54037, #57728: verify the referenced fix is merged and live, then dismiss the corresponding CodeQL alert(s) with an explicit, documented reason (e.g., "false positive" or "fixed"). Do not leave alerts open once root-cause issues are closed. Consider adding a lightweight periodic check (or workflow) that flags alerts whose linked tracking issue is closed but the alert itself remains open, to prevent recurrence.
SLA urgency: high (7 days) — this is a low-effort, high-value fix to remediation velocity and dashboard accuracy.
Discussion report
See the full UK AI Governance: Recent-Changes Risk & Resilience Review (2026-09-02) discussion for the complete asset graph, control verification, and risk-scoring context, including the operational metrics baseline (MTTR proxy, ownership coverage).
Activity
github-actions commentedon Sep 6, 2026
🍪 Issue Monster selected this for Copilot
I've identified this issue as a good candidate for automated resolution and requested assignment to the Copilot coding agent.
If assignment succeeds, the Copilot coding agent will analyze the issue and create a pull request with the fix.
Om nom nom! 🍪
Warning
Firewall blocked 1 domain
The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
ab.chatgpt.comTo allow these domains, add them to the
network.allowedlist in your workflow frontmatter:See Network Configuration for more information.
github-actions commentedon Sep 6, 2026
🍪 Issue Monster selected this for Copilot
I've identified this issue as a good candidate for automated resolution and requested assignment to the Copilot coding agent.
If assignment succeeds, the Copilot coding agent will analyze the issue and create a pull request with the fix.
Om nom nom! 🍪
Warning
Firewall blocked 1 domain
The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
ab.chatgpt.comTo allow these domains, add them to the
network.allowedlist in your workflow frontmatter:See Network Configuration for more information.
github-actions commentedon Sep 7, 2026
🍪 Issue Monster selected this for Copilot
I've identified this issue as a good candidate for automated resolution and requested assignment to the Copilot coding agent.
If assignment succeeds, the Copilot coding agent will analyze the issue and create a pull request with the fix.
Om nom nom! 🍪
Warning
Firewall blocked 1 domain
The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
ab.chatgpt.comTo allow these domains, add them to the
network.allowedlist in your workflow frontmatter:See Network Configuration for more information.
github-actions commentedon Sep 14, 2026
🍪 Issue Monster selected this for Copilot
I've identified this issue as a good candidate for automated resolution and requested assignment to the Copilot coding agent.
If assignment succeeds, the Copilot coding agent will analyze the issue and create a pull request with the fix.
Om nom nom! 🍪
github-actions commentedon Sep 15, 2026
🍪 Issue Monster selected this for Copilot
I've identified this issue as a good candidate for automated resolution and requested assignment to the Copilot coding agent.
If assignment succeeds, the Copilot coding agent will analyze the issue and create a pull request with the fix.
Om nom nom! 🍪
github-actions commentedon Sep 19, 2026
🍪 Issue Monster selected this for Copilot
I've identified this issue as a good candidate for automated resolution and requested assignment to the Copilot coding agent.
If assignment succeeds, the Copilot coding agent will analyze the issue and create a pull request with the fix.
Om nom nom! 🍪
github-actions commentedon Sep 21, 2026
🍪 Issue Monster selected this for Copilot
I've identified this issue as a good candidate for automated resolution and requested assignment to the Copilot coding agent.
If assignment succeeds, the Copilot coding agent will analyze the issue and create a pull request with the fix.
Om nom nom! 🍪
github-actions commentedon Sep 28, 2026
🍪 Issue Monster selected this for Copilot
I've identified this issue as a good candidate for automated resolution and requested assignment to the Copilot coding agent.
If assignment succeeds, the Copilot coding agent will analyze the issue and create a pull request with the fix.
Om nom nom! 🍪
github-actions commentedon Sep 30, 2026
🍪 Issue Monster selected this for Copilot
Ive identified this issue as a good candidate for automated resolution and requested assignment to the Copilot coding agent.
If assignment succeeds, the Copilot coding agent will analyze the issue and create a pull request with the fix.
Om nom nom! 🍪