Skip to content

What other data sets should be included in The Maker Map? #24

Open

Description

@bobthecow

Possibilities:

  • 3D printers (private/commercial)
  • Maker events
  • Hackerspaces (from the wiki, check for activity)
  • Things that already live on other maps?
  • ???

Discuss.

Activity

  1. thisandagain commented on Feb 8, 2013

    @thisandagain
    Contributor

    👍 on hackerspaces

    One thing that I think the Maker Map does naturally which I feel we might as well embrace is that it does a poor job of promoting resources which are not local to your location. Inclusion of services like 'Metals Online', 'Spark Fun' or even 'Ponoko' (sorry @nickpinkston ) seem difficult to present right now in a meaningful way. On the one hand many of these online services (like 3D printing) are built on top of models of scarcity rather than ubiquity, but on the other, most makers that don't live in major metropolitan areas will need to rely on these resources for quite some time.

    In the interest of not attempting to be "all things to all people" I feel it might be prudent for the Maker Map to really focus on the things in which the affordances of a map interface do really well: hardware stores, industrial supply shops, hackerspaces, makerspaces, events, etc.

  2. ScottBlew commented on Feb 12, 2013

    @ScottBlew

    👍

    Agreed, I think for the moment the focus should be brick and motar services,spaces and supply shops that are open and accessible to anyone. I'd love a map that connected home-based makers - for instance connecting a maker with a 3d printer to a maker with a 3d model - but I think that is a project in itself. When the maker map is at a good place I'd like to spin off a version to create a 3D printer - maker map.

  3. nickpinkston commented on Feb 12, 2013

    @nickpinkston

    Haha - @Ponoko are good dudes and uses CloudFab's software, so I'm totally down with adding them. However, I think that the national ones aren't (as mentioned) as useful for a map interface. Maybe there should just be a general resources area?

    If you want to add this map of 3D printing shops - check out this map I made from before:

    https://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msid=202915310548225254212.0004581e3581bc0df3044&msa=0&ll=45.213004,-48.691406&spn=71.253829,155.566406

  4. bobthecow commented on Feb 21, 2013

    @bobthecow
    ContributorAuthor

    I think there's a balance to be struck here. While there are a lot of resources out there, the ones that The Maker Map is really well suited for are actually mappable.

    Would it make sense to create a wiki-like site (or link to an existing one) with non-mappable resources? While they're all valuable resources, I'm reluctant to sacrifice the focus of the site for non-map things like national resources, online services, job postings, etc.

  5. thisandagain commented on Feb 21, 2013

    @thisandagain
    Contributor

    👍 @bobthecow Focus.

  6. nickpinkston commented on Feb 21, 2013

    @nickpinkston

    What do you think is the best way to go about this then? Make something like TheMakerBook.com (-: that handles this and just link them to one another?

  7. bobthecow commented on Feb 21, 2013

    @bobthecow
    ContributorAuthor

    @nickpinkston That seems reasonable. A constellation of single-serving sites that link to each other?

    TheMakerJobs.com
    TheMakerBook.com
    TheMakerMap.com

    :)

  8. nickpinkston commented on Feb 21, 2013

    @nickpinkston

    I'd prefer to just make TheMakerHub.com, and then do everything else there, linking to TheMakerMap after.

    Jobs, Resources, etc. - what else would go there?

  9. patkan commented on Sep 21, 2017

    @patkan

    I think including the locations of all fablabs worldwide would also be beneficial.
    This data is already organised in the form of a map on fablabs.io

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions