You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Found by the same 16-run eval study. Under a --model claude-opus-5 (codegraff gateway) root, the #383 learned-playbook reflector never mints anything: 4/4 fixtures ended with no playbook file, and the seeded fixture gained 0 learned items — while identical tasks under the sol default minted 1–3 items every run.
The trace explains it and raises a second problem: the reflect agent is recorded as model=gpt-5.6-sol, ms=0 in all inspected opus-5 runs — attributed to a DIFFERENT provider than the root, with zero elapsed time (no HTTP call happened). Under the sol root the same agent shows model=gpt-5.6-luna, ms=4471 (a real call). So either:
the reflector resolves its seat via the worker-tier path, lands cross-provider without --allow-cross-provider-subagents consent, gets (correctly) refused somewhere silent, and the failure is swallowed — leaving the learning loop dead under any gateway root; and/or
Fix should make the reflector's seat resolution follow the same consent-aware chain as any worker (a gateway root with no sub should still be able to reflect ON the gateway), and a refused/failed reflection must leave a visible trace note, never a fabricated zero-ms success row.
Evidence: eval-study runs/-C/.graff/traces/.jsonl vs runs/*-A equivalents.
Found by the same 16-run eval study. Under a
--model claude-opus-5(codegraff gateway) root, the #383 learned-playbook reflector never mints anything: 4/4 fixtures ended with no playbook file, and the seeded fixture gained 0 learned items — while identical tasks under the sol default minted 1–3 items every run.The trace explains it and raises a second problem: the
reflectagent is recorded asmodel=gpt-5.6-sol, ms=0in all inspected opus-5 runs — attributed to a DIFFERENT provider than the root, with zero elapsed time (no HTTP call happened). Under the sol root the same agent showsmodel=gpt-5.6-luna, ms=4471(a real call). So either:--allow-cross-provider-subagentsconsent, gets (correctly) refused somewhere silent, and the failure is swallowed — leaving the learning loop dead under any gateway root; and/oragent_route/trace rows (which after Ultracode: learn orchestration and tier policy, not only prompt variants #372 is supposed to be the ground truth).Fix should make the reflector's seat resolution follow the same consent-aware chain as any worker (a gateway root with no sub should still be able to reflect ON the gateway), and a refused/failed reflection must leave a visible trace note, never a fabricated zero-ms success row.
Evidence: eval-study runs/-C/.graff/traces/.jsonl vs runs/*-A equivalents.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01QbsV84fdmf39Bh2RF8LdPs