Skip to content

T002: [Spec 005: Requirements Quality Checklist] Create base checklist template at .specify/templates/checklist-template.md (8 dimensions, ~50 item #3035

Open

Description

@claude

Task Summary

Task ID: T002 — Spec 005: Requirements Quality Checklist.

Create the base checklist template at .specify/templates/checklist-template.md covering the eight quality dimensions (Completeness, Clarity, Consistency, Measurability, Scenario Coverage, Edge Cases, Dependencies, Ambiguities) with roughly 50 items in Markdown.

Current state: not yet delivered. .specify/templates/checklist-template.md on develop is still the generic SpecKit template with six sample items in two placeholder categories, and PR #3361 does not change it. PR #3361 ships the eight dimension bodies as separate files under .specify/templates/checklist-template/content/, and its tasks.md marks T002 [x]. A decision is needed: either update checklist-template.md to the eight-dimension structure, or record that the content/ files satisfy T002 and correct the task wording.

Linked Stories/Tasks

Milestones & Timeline

  • Milestone: v1.1
  • Phase 1 (Setup) of spec 005 tasks.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Task is clearly defined and actionable
  • Task is relevant to project goals
  • Documentation updated if needed
  • Changelog entry prepared for PR if task completed via PR
  • Correct branch prefix for PR (task/)
  • PR description updated with relevant details
  • Changelog entry prepared for PR (if applicable)
  • Labels/types match org standards

Steps / Checklist

Dependencies

Additional Context

/speckit-checklist reads checklist-template.md, so changing it affects every generated checklist.


Definition of Ready (DoR)

  • Task described and scoped
  • Estimate added if relevant

Definition of Done (DoD)

  • Task completed and documented
  • Changelog entry prepared for PR
  • PR uses correct branch prefix (task/)
  • Documentation/changelog updated if needed
  • Branch deleted after merge
  • Linked issue(s) updated with latest status and closed after merge,
  • The related epic should not be closed, instead updated with a comment to reflect the closed issue

Generated with Claude Code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

Fields

Priority

None yet

Projects

No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions