Skip to content

[Child of #652] Audit: Validate Mermaid Syntax in All Diagrams #668

Description

@ashleyshaw

Overview

Validate Mermaid diagram syntax across all README files to identify and document parsing errors.

Scope

  • For each README with Mermaid diagrams, validate syntax
  • Check for parse errors in each diagram
  • Verify diagram type is supported by Mermaid
  • Test rendering in Mermaid Live Editor
  • Document specific errors and required fixes

Audit Checklist

  • Extract all Mermaid diagrams from READMEs
  • Test each diagram in Mermaid Live Editor
  • Document any syntax errors found
  • Verify diagram type (flowchart, sequence, state, etc.)
  • Check for unsupported diagram types
  • Document specific line numbers of errors
  • Create list of diagrams needing fixes

Deliverables

  • Mermaid syntax validation report
  • List of diagrams with errors
  • Specific error descriptions and line numbers
  • Recommendations for fixes
  • Spreadsheet: README | Diagram Type | Has Error | Error Description | Severity

Related Files

  • All README.md files with Mermaid diagrams
  • Mermaid documentation

Related Documentation


Definition of Ready (DoR)

  • Clear problem statement and expected outcome
  • Acceptance criteria defined
  • Related issues/dependencies identified
  • Required resources/approvals listed

Definition of Done (DoD)

  • All acceptance criteria met
  • Changes tested and validated
  • Documentation updated
  • Changes merged and deployed
  • Stakeholders notified

Activity

  1. linear-code commented on May 31, 2026

    @linear-code
  2. added 9 commits that reference this issue on May 31, 2026
  3. added 2 commits that reference this issue on May 31, 2026
  4. ashleyshaw commented on Jun 1, 2026

    @ashleyshaw
    MemberAuthor

    Admin note (2026-06-01): intended delivery for this workstream is PR #723 into . PR #703 was merged to by mistake and was reverted by PR #726.

  5. ashleyshaw commented on Jun 1, 2026

    @ashleyshaw
    MemberAuthor

    Correction: this workstream should reference PR #723 on develop as canonical. PR #703 hit main accidentally and was reverted by PR #726.

  6. github-actions commented on Jun 19, 2026

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    ⚠️ This issue does not follow a required issue template.

    Missing required section(s): Definition of Ready (DoR), Definition of Done (DoD)

    The issue will remain open and flagged until the body is corrected.
    Please update the issue with one of the official templates:

    If this was opened by automation, update the automation to preserve the template sections before creating the issue.

  7. added this to the v1.2 milestone on Jul 22, 2026
  8. self-assigned this
    on Sep 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

Fields

Priority

None yet

Projects

No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions