feat(agents): upgrade mode-document-reviewer spec to v1.1 by ashleyshaw · Pull Request #516 · lightspeedwp/.github

ashleyshaw · 2026-05-28T11:41:16Z

Summary

Upgrades agents/mode-document-reviewer.agent.md frontmatter to be fully spec-compliant: adds version, last_updated, owners, tags, file_type, status, domain, stability, and permissions fields
Adds Implementation Status section with gap-analysis table confirming this is a conversational mode agent (no GitHub Actions workflow needed)
Adds Dependencies section linking related mode agents and instructions
Adds Changelog section tracking spec history
Updates CHANGELOG.md with entry for this change

Closes #471

Acceptance criteria mapping

Criterion	Status
Agent scope and intended outcome documented	✅ Pre-existing spec body is comprehensive (editorial standards, grading rubric, output format)
Dependencies and related workflows/instructions linked	✅ Added Dependencies section
Implementation or explicit defer decision recorded	✅ Gap-analysis table + "no workflow needed" rationale
Documentation updated if spec changes	✅ Changelog section added

Test plan

CI linting passes on the updated Markdown file
Frontmatter validation passes (npm run validate:frontmatter)
No references: field present in frontmatter (CLAUDE.md rule)

https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ukh7BPcSJQcr3zwA6QqqCV

Generated by Claude Code

coderabbitai · 2026-05-28T11:41:26Z

Warning

Review limit reached

@ashleyshaw, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 57 minutes and 9 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 107d312e-b2ba-4f9a-aa26-7140ff396cda

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8412f00 and f5ac68d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

CHANGELOG.md
agents/mode-document-reviewer.agent.md

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

Create PR with unit tests
Commit unit tests in branch feat/471-mode-document-reviewer-agent

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

gemini-code-assist

Code Review

This pull request upgrades the mode-document-reviewer.agent.md agent to v1.1 by adding complete frontmatter fields, permissions, an implementation status gap-analysis table, dependencies, and a changelog, alongside updating the project's CHANGELOG.md. Feedback suggests updating the relative documentation links in the dependencies section to use absolute URLs with /blob/HEAD/ to comply with repository standards and prevent broken links.

gemini-code-assist · 2026-05-28T11:42:06Z

+- [agents/mode-thinking.agent.md](./mode-thinking.agent.md) — complementary mode agent for deep autonomous problem-solving
+- [agents/mode-demonstrate-understanding.agent.md](./mode-demonstrate-understanding.agent.md) — complementary mode agent for guided understanding validation
+- [agents/mode-prd.agent.md](./mode-prd.agent.md) — complementary mode agent for product requirements documentation
+- [agents/template.agent.md](./template.agent.md) — canonical agent template this spec conforms to
+- [instructions/coding-standards.instructions.md](../instructions/coding-standards.instructions.md) — coding standards applied during technical content review


According to the repository's coding standards, all documentation links to files within the same repository should use /blob/HEAD/ in URLs to ensure universality across branches and avoid broken links after merges.

Suggested change

- [agents/mode-thinking.agent.md](./mode-thinking.agent.md) — complementary mode agent for deep autonomous problem-solving

- [agents/mode-demonstrate-understanding.agent.md](./mode-demonstrate-understanding.agent.md) — complementary mode agent for guided understanding validation

- [agents/mode-prd.agent.md](./mode-prd.agent.md) — complementary mode agent for product requirements documentation

- [agents/template.agent.md](./template.agent.md) — canonical agent template this spec conforms to

- [instructions/coding-standards.instructions.md](../instructions/coding-standards.instructions.md) — coding standards applied during technical content review

- [agents/mode-thinking.agent.md](https://github.com/lightspeedwp/.github/blob/HEAD/agents/mode-thinking.agent.md) — complementary mode agent for deep autonomous problem-solving

- [agents/mode-demonstrate-understanding.agent.md](https://github.com/lightspeedwp/.github/blob/HEAD/agents/mode-demonstrate-understanding.agent.md) — complementary mode agent for guided understanding validation

- [agents/mode-prd.agent.md](https://github.com/lightspeedwp/.github/blob/HEAD/agents/mode-prd.agent.md) — complementary mode agent for product requirements documentation

- [agents/template.agent.md](https://github.com/lightspeedwp/.github/blob/HEAD/agents/template.agent.md) — canonical agent template this spec conforms to

- [instructions/coding-standards.instructions.md](https://github.com/lightspeedwp/.github/blob/HEAD/instructions/coding-standards.instructions.md) — coding standards applied during technical content review

References

All documentation links to files within the same repository should use /blob/HEAD/ in URLs to ensure universality across branches and avoid broken links after merges. ^(link)

github-actions · 2026-05-28T11:42:31Z

🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #516

CI Status: ✅ success
Files changed: 2

Recommendations

Ready to proceed pending human review

Adds complete frontmatter (version, last_updated, owners, tags, file_type, status, domain, stability, permissions), an Implementation Status gap-analysis table confirming no workflow is needed (conversational mode agent), a Dependencies section linking related agents and instructions, and a Changelog. Closes #471 https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ukh7BPcSJQcr3zwA6QqqCV

github-actions · 2026-05-28T12:09:45Z

🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #516

CI Status: ✅ success
Files changed: 2

Recommendations

Ready to proceed pending human review

- Comprehensive analysis of current state (26 issue templates, 19 PR templates) - Identified 10 major issues: template mismatch, branch prefix fragmentation, story type unclear, improve/enhance duplication, duplicate labels, missing PR labels, openspec redundancy - Created 6 critical decision questions for user input - Listed recommendations for each issue with priorities - Documented next steps blocked on user clarification - Ready for implementation once decisions are confirmed Relates to #516 Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Kqs3ZG2AnQbqWv3mJMLw8Z

Major updates to align issue templates, PR templates, branch prefixes, labels, and documentation: **Issue Templates (Consolidation)** - Deleted: story (merged into feature), maintenance (merged into task), help (merged into question) - Created: new type:question template consolidating help/support/question issues - Result: 26 templates → 23 templates with cleaner mappings **PR Templates (Label Enrichment)** - All 14 PR templates now seed default labels for type, status, priority, area, meta families - Added `recommended_issue_type` field to each template for two-way mapping (issue → branch → PR template) - Examples: pr_bug now seeds [type:bug, status:needs-review, priority:normal, area:core, meta:needs-changelog] **Labels (Consolidation & Addition)** - Added 4 new area labels: area:playwright, area:jest, area:phpunit, area:pagespeed (all tagged for testing) - Deprecated type:integration (consolidated into area:integration) - Simplified openspec labels: removed 6 workflow labels (specification/implementation) - using standard status:* instead - Result: 145 canonical labels → 143 labels with clearer taxonomy **Configuration (Automation Mappings)** - Updated .github/labeler.yml: Split build/ci into separate type mappings, added new area label rules - Updated .github/label-governance-policy.yml: Added new labels to never_delete list - All branch prefixes now have explicit type:* mappings and priority rules **Documentation (Strategy & Governance)** - Updated BRANCHING_STRATEGY.md section 4.3: Added default labels, recommended issue types, two-way mapping table - Updated BRANCHING_STRATEGY.md section 5.1: Documented labeler automation, new area labels, priority mapping rules - Updated BRANCHING_STRATEGY.md section 5.2: Created comprehensive Issue Type → Project Type mapping table - Created new docs/ISSUE_PR_TITLE_GOVERNANCE.md: Title format standards, examples, scope guidance, automation rules **Key Decisions Implemented** 1. Story issue → Replaced with type:ci (CI/CD workflows) 2. Improve vs Enhance → Kept both with distinct meanings (user chose C) 3. Default area label → Auto-assign via labeler.yml rules (file path matching) 4. Default priority → Assign by branch type (hotfix/security=critical, a11y=high, others=normal) 5. Openspec labels → Reduced from 13 to 4 (status labels only; using standard status:* for workflows) Relates to #516 Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Kqs3ZG2AnQbqWv3mJMLw8Z

ashleyshaw · 2026-09-04T15:09:14Z

Planning analysis merged in PR #2822. Issue and PR template improvement analysis complete.

gemini-code-assist Bot reviewed May 28, 2026

View reviewed changes

ashleyshaw marked this pull request as ready for review May 28, 2026 12:05

github-actions Bot removed the migrate:type:chore Chore / small hygiene change label May 28, 2026

ashleyshaw force-pushed the feat/471-mode-document-reviewer-agent branch from 0033c53 to f5ac68d Compare May 28, 2026 12:06

ashleyshaw merged commit 44dfa31 into develop May 28, 2026

ashleyshaw deleted the feat/471-mode-document-reviewer-agent branch May 28, 2026 12:06

ashleyshaw mentioned this pull request May 28, 2026

[Task] Track spec-only agent: mode-document-reviewer.agent #471

Closed

8 tasks

This was referenced Sep 4, 2026

docs: Add planning analysis for issue and PR template improvements #2819

Closed

docs: Add planning analysis for issue and PR template improvements #2821

Closed

docs: Add planning analysis for issue and PR template improvements #2822

Merged

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

feat(agents): upgrade mode-document-reviewer spec to v1.1 - #516

feat(agents): upgrade mode-document-reviewer spec to v1.1#516
ashleyshaw merged 1 commit into
developfrom
feat/471-mode-document-reviewer-agent

ashleyshaw commented May 28, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented May 28, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Review limit reached

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist Bot May 28, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 28, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 28, 2026

Uh oh!

ashleyshaw commented Sep 4, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Uh oh!

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

ashleyshaw commented May 28, 2026

Summary

Acceptance criteria mapping

Test plan

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented May 28, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Review limit reached

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Code Review

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist Bot May 28, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 28, 2026

🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #516

Recommendations

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 28, 2026

🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #516

Recommendations

Uh oh!

ashleyshaw commented Sep 4, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Uh oh!

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

coderabbitai Bot commented May 28, 2026 •

edited

Loading