Skip to content

T060 Test: fix/ template routing - #484

Closed
ashleyshaw wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/template-routing-test-1
Closed

ashleyshaw wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/template-routing-test-1

Conversation

@ashleyshaw

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Test PR for verifying fix/ branch template routing in PR template system.

Expected behavior: This PR should be routed to the bug fix template.


Generated by Claude Code

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Oct 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
thisonetimeonacidcom Ready Ready Preview Oct 24, 2026 4:52pm UTC

@netlify

netlify Bot commented Oct 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Deploy Preview for thisonetimeonacid ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 9668e6f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/thisonetimeonacid/deploys/6adce245bdcaab1bff5b14d6
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-484--thisonetimeonacid.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
🤖 Make changes Run an agent on this branch

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Template Routing 📋

Branch prefix: fix

Suggested template: pr_bug.md

Type: Bug Fix PR


Canonical templates are managed in lightspeedwp/.github:

  • Review the suggested template to ensure your PR description covers the required sections
  • All PR templates route from the central .github repository

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Drift Detection ✅

✅ No drift detected. Configuration is canonical.

Canonical governance files are correctly centralized in lightspeedwp/.github.

ashleyshaw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2026
Fix data integrity issues identified by CodeRabbit:
1. Remove T060 from executive summary (line 23) - now marks as complete
2. Remove T060 from handoff checklist (line 307) - only T061, T062, T064 pending
3. Update T060 details (line 149) to record all test PR evidence:
   - PR #483 (feat/ → type:feature)
   - PR #484 (fix/ → type:bug)
   - PR #485 (docs/ → type:documentation)
   - PR #486 (test/ → type:test)
   - PR #488 (proto/ → type:maintenance, fallback template)

All routing comments and labels verified for each test case.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016hNMcvrE64pAKFHgLLMYJo
@ashleyshaw ashleyshaw closed this Oct 25, 2026
ashleyshaw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2026
…recorded

All 4 routing scenarios verified:
- feat/* → pr_feature.md with type:feature label (PR #483)
- fix/* → pr_bug.md with type:bug label (PR #484)
- docs/* → pr_documentation.md with type:documentation label (PR #485)
- Unmatched prefix → pr_default.md with type:maintenance label (PR #488)

Evidence table in tasks.md updated with PR links and verification status.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ECUfntYjr3GzZcRFXFhnJZ
ashleyshaw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2026
- Verified all four test PRs (483, 484, 485, 488) demonstrating template routing
- Confirmed named-template selection precedence based on branch prefix
- Verified contributor content preservation in PR descriptions
- Phase 9 convergence now 99% complete (T060-T062 verified; T065 pending owner sign-off)
- Updated COMPLETION.md and tasks.md to reflect T060 completion status

Evidence:
- PR #483 (feat/*) → type:feature label ✅
- PR #484 (fix/*) → type:bug label ✅
- PR #485 (docs/*) → type:documentation label ✅
- PR #488 (proto/*) → type:maintenance label (fallback) ✅

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ECUfntYjr3GzZcRFXFhnJZ
ashleyshaw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2026
…recorded

All 4 routing scenarios verified:
- feat/* → pr_feature.md with type:feature label (PR #483)
- fix/* → pr_bug.md with type:bug label (PR #484)
- docs/* → pr_documentation.md with type:documentation label (PR #485)
- Unmatched prefix → pr_default.md with type:maintenance label (PR #488)

Evidence table in tasks.md updated with PR links and verification status.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ECUfntYjr3GzZcRFXFhnJZ
ashleyshaw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2026
- Verified all four test PRs (483, 484, 485, 488) demonstrating template routing
- Confirmed named-template selection precedence based on branch prefix
- Verified contributor content preservation in PR descriptions
- Phase 9 convergence now 99% complete (T060-T062 verified; T065 pending owner sign-off)
- Updated COMPLETION.md and tasks.md to reflect T060 completion status

Evidence:
- PR #483 (feat/*) → type:feature label ✅
- PR #484 (fix/*) → type:bug label ✅
- PR #485 (docs/*) → type:documentation label ✅
- PR #488 (proto/*) → type:maintenance label (fallback) ✅

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ECUfntYjr3GzZcRFXFhnJZ
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants