change: [STORIF-106] Object Storage Summary page changed. - #13087
Merged
abailly-akamai merged 2 commits intoNov 25, 2025
Conversation
dchyrva-akamai
force-pushed
the
feature/STORIF-106_RECREATED
branch
from
November 13, 2025 10:33
1d04b67 to
ba12fdb
Compare
dchyrva-akamai
marked this pull request as ready for review
November 13, 2025 11:25
dwiley-akamai
approved these changes
Nov 13, 2025
dwiley-akamai
left a comment
dwiley-akamai
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's have an Upcoming Features changeset entry for this as well 👍🏾
dchyrva-akamai
force-pushed
the
feature/STORIF-106_RECREATED
branch
2 times, most recently
from
November 14, 2025 08:38
497a935 to
fac6d56
Compare
dchyrva-akamai
force-pushed
the
feature/STORIF-106_RECREATED
branch
5 times, most recently
from
November 20, 2025 14:15
c563044 to
47e6fbe
Compare
dchyrva-akamai
force-pushed
the
feature/STORIF-106_RECREATED
branch
3 times, most recently
from
November 21, 2025 09:25
cd91ef2 to
5093cea
Compare
Contributor
|
What are the steps to verify it locally? I'm not seeing any endpoints when I run it despite enabling all the feature flags. |
dchyrva-akamai
force-pushed
the
feature/STORIF-106_RECREATED
branch
from
November 21, 2025 14:31
5093cea to
86613b6
Compare
skulpok-akamai
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2025
dchyrva-akamai
force-pushed
the
feature/STORIF-106_RECREATED
branch
from
November 24, 2025 09:27
86613b6 to
c775928
Compare
dchyrva-akamai
force-pushed
the
feature/STORIF-106_RECREATED
branch
from
November 24, 2025 14:18
c775928 to
a33ac10
Compare
Cloud Manager UI test results🎉 862 passing tests on test run #15 ↗︎
|
bnussman-akamai
approved these changes
Nov 24, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description 📝
Object Storage Summary page updated to use table instead of bare rows.
Preview 📷
How to test 🧪
As an Author, to speed up the review process, I considered 🤔
👀 Doing a self review
❔ Our contribution guidelines
🤏 Splitting feature into small PRs
➕ Adding a changeset
🧪 Providing/improving test coverage
🔐 Removing all sensitive information from the code and PR description
🚩 Using a feature flag to protect the release
👣 Providing comprehensive reproduction steps
📑 Providing or updating our documentation
🕛 Scheduling a pair reviewing session
📱 Providing mobile support
♿ Providing accessibility support
As an Author, before moving this PR from Draft to Open, I confirmed ✅