Skip to content

Question : Does the output of cptofs in Windows 64 looks correct? #312

Description

@spoiledsport

Guys

After testing my Windows 64 (LP64) build and making changes to compile cptofs, when I run the command to copy a file called build to an ext image

E:\Dev\GitHub\spoiledsport\linux\linux\tools\lkl>cptofs.exe -p -t ext3 -i sample.img build

I get the following output

[ 0.000000] Linux version 4.9.0+ (ediso@DESKTOP-PPLRP4G) (gcc version 6.3.0 (GCC) ) #1 Sun Feb 5 14:40:15 EST 2017
[ 0.000000] bootmem address range: 0x6fff9bf1000 - 0x6ffffff0000
[ 0.000000] Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 25249
[ 0.000000] Kernel command line: virtio_mmio.device=292@0x1000000:1
[ 0.000000] PID hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
[ 0.000000] Dentry cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
[ 0.000000] Inode-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
[ 0.000000] Memory available: 100696k/0k RAM
[ 0.000000] SLUB: HWalign=32, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=1, Nodes=1
[ 0.000000] NR_IRQS:4096
[ 0.000000] lkl: irqs initialized
[ 0.000000] clocksource: lkl: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x1cd42e4dffb, max_idle_ns: 881590591483 ns
[ 0.000000] lkl: time and timers initialized (irq2)
[ 0.000000] pid_max: default: 4096 minimum: 301
[ 0.000000] Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
[ 0.000000] Mountpoint-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
[ 0.169000] console [lkl_console0] enabled
[ 0.169000] clocksource: jiffies: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff, max_idle_ns: 19112604462750000 ns
[ 0.185000] xor: automatically using best checksumming function 8regs
[ 0.185000] NET: Registered protocol family 16
[ 0.472000] raid6: int64x1 gen() 4435 MB/s
[ 0.737000] raid6: int64x1 xor() 2652 MB/s
[ 1.001000] raid6: int64x2 gen() 5987 MB/s
[ 1.264000] raid6: int64x2 xor() 3717 MB/s
[ 1.528000] raid6: int64x4 gen() 4457 MB/s
[ 1.803000] raid6: int64x4 xor() 3525 MB/s
[ 2.067000] raid6: int64x8 gen() 4521 MB/s
[ 2.343000] raid6: int64x8 xor() 3196 MB/s
[ 2.349000] raid6: using algorithm int64x2 gen() 5987 MB/s
[ 2.353000] raid6: .... xor() 3717 MB/s, rmw enabled
[ 2.354000] raid6: using intx1 recovery algorithm
[ 2.359000] clocksource: Switched to clocksource lkl
[ 2.364000] NET: Registered protocol family 2
[ 2.379000] TCP established hash table entries: 1024 (order: 1, 8192 bytes)
[ 2.379000] TCP bind hash table entries: 1024 (order: 1, 8192 bytes)
[ 2.379000] TCP: Hash tables configured (established 1024 bind 1024)
[ 2.395000] UDP hash table entries: 128 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
[ 2.411000] UDP-Lite hash table entries: 128 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
[ 2.411000] virtio-mmio: Registering device virtio-mmio.0 at 0x1000000-0x1000123, IRQ 1.
[ 2.411000] workingset: timestamp_bits=62 max_order=15 bucket_order=0
[ 2.426000] SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, no debug enabled
[ 2.442000] jitterentropy: Initialization failed with host not compliant with requirements: 2
[ 2.442000] io scheduler noop registered
[ 2.464000] io scheduler deadline registered
[ 2.464000] io scheduler cfq registered (default)
[ 2.479000] mousedev: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
[ 2.495000] NET: Registered protocol family 10
[ 2.511000] sit: IPv6, IPv4 and MPLS over IPv4 tunneling driver
[ 2.511000] Btrfs loaded, crc32c=crc32c-generic
[ 2.511000] Warning: unable to open an initial console.
[ 2.511000] This architecture does not have kernel memory protection.
[ 2.526000] EXT4-fs (vda): mounting ext3 file system using the ext4 subsystem
[ 2.542000] EXT4-fs (vda): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts:
[ 2.558000] reboot: Restarting system

As you can see I added a bunch of fs to the build :-)

Some things that bother me
1- Why does the system reports
[ 0.000000] Memory available: 100696k/0k RAM
2.- How do I know the copy was successful or not?
3.- Where is bogomips and other things I expected from normal Linux boot?

Sorry for being so "virgin" with my questions. I am really loving this library and I can't stop playing with it. I just want to make sure that I doing the right thing.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions