Skip to content

.NET: Skip OffThread observability test#4399

Merged
rogerbarreto merged 2 commits into
microsoft:mainfrom
rogerbarreto:issues/wf-ut-telemetry-skip
Mar 2, 2026
Merged

.NET: Skip OffThread observability test#4399
rogerbarreto merged 2 commits into
microsoft:mainfrom
rogerbarreto:issues/wf-ut-telemetry-skip

Conversation

@rogerbarreto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Motivation and Context

Temporarily skip CreatesWorkflowEndToEndActivities_WithCorrectName_OffThreadAsync due to intermittent failures. Tracked in #4398.

Temporarily skip CreatesWorkflowEndToEndActivities_WithCorrectName_OffThreadAsync
due to intermittent failures. Tracked in microsoft#4398.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 2, 2026 18:56
@markwallace-microsoft markwallace-microsoft added the .NET Usage: [Issues, PRs], Target: .Net label Mar 2, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot changed the title .Net: Skip OffThread observability test .NET: Skip OffThread observability test Mar 2, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Temporarily disables a flaky .NET unit test in the workflows observability suite to reduce intermittent CI failures while the root cause is investigated (tracked in #4398).

Changes:

  • Skips CreatesWorkflowEndToEndActivities_WithCorrectName_OffThreadAsync via xUnit [Fact(Skip = ...)].

Comment thread dotnet/tests/Microsoft.Agents.AI.Workflows.UnitTests/ObservabilityTests.cs Outdated
…lityTests.cs

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@rogerbarreto rogerbarreto enabled auto-merge March 2, 2026 19:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

.NET Usage: [Issues, PRs], Target: .Net

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants