This is a follow up to #879. After the fixes there I was finally able to generate demo SOAP requests.
For tests I am using the WSDL from the tests itself:
|
<wsdl:definitions |
|
xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" |
|
xmlns:tns="http://Example.org" |
|
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" |
|
xmlns:wsaw="http://www.w3.org/2006/05/addressing/wsdl" |
|
targetNamespace="http://Example.org" |
|
xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"> |
|
<wsdl:types> |
|
<xsd:schema elementFormDefault="qualified" > |
|
<xsd:element name="AddResponse"> |
|
<xsd:complexType> |
|
<xsd:sequence> |
|
<xsd:element minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" ref="demo" /> |
|
</xsd:sequence> |
|
</xsd:complexType> |
|
</xsd:element> |
|
<xsd:element name="Add"> |
|
<xsd:complexType> |
|
<xsd:sequence> |
|
<xsd:element minOccurs="1" name="a" type="xsd:int" /> |
|
<xsd:element minOccurs="1" name="b" type="xsd:int" /> |
|
</xsd:sequence> |
|
</xsd:complexType> |
|
</xsd:element> |
|
<xsd:element name="AddResponse"> |
|
<xsd:complexType> |
|
<xsd:sequence> |
|
<xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="result" type="xsd:int" /> |
|
</xsd:sequence> |
|
</xsd:complexType> |
|
</xsd:element> |
|
</xsd:schema> |
|
<xsd:schema elementFormDefault="qualified" > |
|
<xsd:element name="demo"> |
|
</xsd:element> |
|
</xsd:schema> |
|
</wsdl:types> |
|
<wsdl:message name="ICalculator_Add_InputMessage"> |
|
<wsdl:part name="parameters" element="Add" /> |
|
</wsdl:message> |
|
<wsdl:message name="ICalculator_Add_OutputMessage"> |
|
<wsdl:part name="parameters" element="AddResponse" /> |
|
</wsdl:message> |
|
<wsdl:portType name="ICalculator"> |
|
<wsdl:operation name="Add"> |
|
<wsdl:input wsaw:Action="http://Example.org/ICalculator/Add" message="tns:ICalculator_Add_InputMessage" /> |
|
<wsdl:output wsaw:Action="http://Example.org/ICalculator/AddResponse" message="tns:ICalculator_Add_OutputMessage" /> |
|
</wsdl:operation> |
|
</wsdl:portType> |
|
<wsdl:binding name="DefaultBinding_ICalculator" type="tns:ICalculator"> |
|
<soap:binding transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http" /> |
|
<wsdl:operation name="Add"> |
|
<soap:operation soapAction="http://Example.org/ICalculator/Add" style="document" /> |
|
<wsdl:input> |
|
<soap:body use="literal" /> |
|
</wsdl:input> |
|
<wsdl:output> |
|
<soap:body use="literal" /> |
|
</wsdl:output> |
|
</wsdl:operation> |
|
</wsdl:binding> |
|
<wsdl:service name="CalculatorService"> |
|
<wsdl:port name="ICalculator" binding="tns:DefaultBinding_ICalculator"> |
|
<soap:address location="http://Example.org/ICalculator" /> |
|
</wsdl:port> |
|
</wsdl:service> |
|
</wsdl:definitions> |
I am attaching several requests using multiple clients.
First off, SOAP UI:
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soapenv:Header/>
<soapenv:Body>
<Add>
<a>?</a>
<b>?</b>
</Add>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>Then against Liquid studio (which got mentioned in the previous issue):
<SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<SOAP-ENV:Body>
<Add xmlns:tns="http://Example.org" xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" xmlns:wsaw="http://www.w3.org/2006/05/addressing/wsdl" xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<a>-3439</a>
<b>1611</b>
</Add>
</SOAP-ENV:Body>
</SOAP-ENV:Envelope>And then zeep itself (on master)
<soap-env:Envelope xmlns:soap-env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soap-env:Header xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">
<wsa:Action>http://Example.org/ICalculator/Add</wsa:Action>
<wsa:MessageID>urn:uuid:e1036f6a-04e1-459b-8795-a27f14a4da81</wsa:MessageID>
<wsa:To>http://127.0.0.1:8000</wsa:To>
</soap-env:Header>
<soap-env:Body>
<ns0:Add xmlns:ns0="http://Example.org">
<ns0:a>3</ns0:a>
<ns0:b>3</ns0:b>
</ns0:Add>
</soap-env:Body>
</soap-env:Envelope>Zeep is the only client inheriting the target namespace of the wsdl definition; this might be wrong. Do you have any ideas what the "correct" approach is? The results are clearly different (no namespace vs a namespace)
This is a follow up to #879. After the fixes there I was finally able to generate demo SOAP requests.
For tests I am using the WSDL from the tests itself:
python-zeep/tests/test_wsdl.py
Lines 1040 to 1106 in 713c779
I am attaching several requests using multiple clients.
First off, SOAP UI:
Then against Liquid studio (which got mentioned in the previous issue):
And then zeep itself (on master)
Zeep is the only client inheriting the target namespace of the wsdl definition; this might be wrong. Do you have any ideas what the "correct" approach is? The results are clearly different (no namespace vs a namespace)