Skip to content

Use newer OCP release for CI tests - #1077

Merged
danpawlik merged 1 commit into
openstack-k8s-operators:mainfrom
danpawlik:test-other-nodeset
Mar 5, 2026
Merged

danpawlik merged 1 commit into
openstack-k8s-operators:mainfrom
danpawlik:test-other-nodeset

Conversation

@danpawlik

@danpawlik danpawlik commented Feb 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The Zuul CI service still uses old nodeset, that has been removed in
pull request [1].

Update the nodeset and set it into the project definition to ensure
that CI job uses nodeset what was provided. In next follow-up change,
the parameters would be removed, to use parent nodeset.

NOTE: that change was done because Zuul did not respect parent nodeset
as it was set in pull request [2].

[1] openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3727
[2] #1076

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Feb 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@danpawlik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

now it is weird. It is still 2.39

@softwarefactory-project-zuul

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/4113042ff6be4538ac10babe72840795

❌ openstack-meta-content-provider FAILURE in 7m 26s
⚠️ nova-operator-kuttl SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-meta-content-provider
⚠️ nova-operator-tempest-multinode SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-meta-content-provider
⚠️ nova-operator-tempest-multinode-ceph SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-meta-content-provider

@danpawlik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

recheck

@softwarefactory-project-zuul

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/c9f1e0fb1ce14d008224e19bcce40b74

❌ openstack-meta-content-provider FAILURE in 10m 00s
⚠️ nova-operator-kuttl SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-meta-content-provider
⚠️ nova-operator-tempest-multinode SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-meta-content-provider
⚠️ nova-operator-tempest-multinode-ceph SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-meta-content-provider

@danpawlik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

recheck

@danpawlik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

now jobs starts with 4.18.

@softwarefactory-project-zuul

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/feb2949d85424d87bce5f7df2eb01806

✔️ openstack-meta-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 47m 30s
✔️ nova-operator-kuttl SUCCESS in 51m 26s
❌ nova-operator-tempest-multinode FAILURE in 1h 29m 38s
❌ nova-operator-tempest-multinode-ceph FAILURE in 1h 27m 31s

@danpawlik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

recheck

@danpawlik
danpawlik force-pushed the test-other-nodeset branch from 8955ee6 to ae7947a Compare March 5, 2026 08:42
The Zuul CI service still uses old nodeset, that has been removed in
pull request [1].

Update the nodeset and set it into the project definition to ensure
that CI job uses nodeset what was provided. In next follow-up change,
the parameters would be removed, to use parent nodeset.

NOTE: that change was done because Zuul did not respect parent nodeset
as it was set in pull request [2].

[1] openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3727
[2] openstack-k8s-operators#1076

Signed-off-by: Daniel Pawlik <dpawlik@redhat.com>
@danpawlik
danpawlik force-pushed the test-other-nodeset branch from ae7947a to 00f902c Compare March 5, 2026 11:41
@danpawlik danpawlik changed the title DNM Check Zuul CI nodeset Use newer OCP release for CI tests Mar 5, 2026
@danpawlik
danpawlik marked this pull request as ready for review March 5, 2026 11:42
@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from dprince and kk7ds March 5, 2026 11:42

@mrkisaolamb mrkisaolamb left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danpawlik, gibizer, mrkisaolamb

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [gibizer,mrkisaolamb]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@danpawlik
danpawlik merged commit 9c5a6c3 into openstack-k8s-operators:main Mar 5, 2026
5 of 7 checks passed
@danpawlik
danpawlik deleted the test-other-nodeset branch March 5, 2026 16:00
danpawlik added a commit to danpawlik/ci-framework that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2026
Jobs that are based on podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc has
difficulties to pass. One example, where changing nodeset helps
is in nova-operator [1].
Change nodeset to bigger to avoid job flakiness.

[1] openstack-k8s-operators/nova-operator#1077

Signed-off-by: Daniel Pawlik <dpawlik@redhat.com>
openshift-merge-bot Bot pushed a commit to openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2026
Jobs that are based on podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc has
difficulties to pass. One example, where changing nodeset helps
is in nova-operator [1].
Change nodeset to bigger to avoid job flakiness.

[1] openstack-k8s-operators/nova-operator#1077

Signed-off-by: Daniel Pawlik <dpawlik@redhat.com>
@danpawlik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick 18.0-fr5

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@danpawlik: new pull request created: #1085

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick 18.0-fr5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants