Hi,
Thanks for sharing this work. Could you clarify how the methods in Table 4 were evaluated? Some numbers seem to differ from the original papers, for example 12.6 for SAN as reported in Table-4 but 15.7 as reported in SAN paper for PC-459 dataset.
I may be missing something, so any clarification would help.
Thanks!
Hi,
Thanks for sharing this work. Could you clarify how the methods in Table 4 were evaluated? Some numbers seem to differ from the original papers, for example 12.6 for SAN as reported in Table-4 but 15.7 as reported in SAN paper for PC-459 dataset.
I may be missing something, so any clarification would help.
Thanks!