test(home): add unit tests for FAQ component - #3920
Conversation
14 tests covering: rendering, columns, null-safety, computed styles, and JSON-LD FAQPage schema generation. Audit finding: FAQ component was added without unit tests.
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 21 minutes and 37 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis pull request adds a comprehensive unit test suite for the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3920 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.25% 99.25%
=======================================
Files 30 30
Lines 944 944
Branches 246 246
=======================================
Hits 937 937
Misses 7 7 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds dedicated unit test coverage for HomeFaqComponent to address an audit gap and validate rendering, layout, null-safety, computed styles, and JSON-LD generation behavior.
Changes:
- Introduces 14 unit tests for
HomeFaqComponentrendering and content behavior (including edge cases). - Verifies 1 vs 2 column splitting logic and computed style outputs.
- Validates JSON-LD FAQPage schema generation via
useHead(and no-op behavior when content is empty).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@src/modules/home/tests/home.faq.component.unit.tests.js`:
- Around line 35-50: The helper functions globalOpts(vuetify) and
makeFaq(overrides) lack JSDoc headers; add JSDoc blocks above each function
including a brief description, a `@param` entry for the parameter (e.g., `@param`
{Object} vuetify - Vuetify instance for globalOpts; `@param` {Object} [overrides]
- optional fields to override default FAQ for makeFaq) and a `@returns` entry
describing the returned object (e.g., `@returns` {Object} - mounting options for
globalOpts; `@returns` {Object} - FAQ object for makeFaq), ensuring types and
optionality are explicit per the repository guidelines.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: b979e0bc-a9dd-43b2-aaf0-a2995aaa26e9
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/modules/home/tests/home.faq.component.unit.tests.js
Summary
HomeFaqComponentcovering:useHeadRoot cause
Audit finding: FAQ component was added without dedicated unit tests.
Test plan
Summary by CodeRabbit