You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Decide Whether #2033 Merges Over Unstated Copilot Coverage #2034
May #2033 merge to develop although pr_review.py exits 45, COVERAGE_IS_UNSTATED, on its head?
Context
Handoff #2030 (track auto-2028) fixes #2028 in #2033, head 3e285f38, one changed file (host-setup/agent-safety/claude/gh-write-guard.py). Every other Merge Gate item holds: checks 10/10, unresolved=0, suppressed=0, shapes ok, and the run's develop scope answers the permission item. The digest's own text says merging without stated coverage is the maintainer's decision, so this unattended lane parked rather than merged.
Coverage evidence read by hand from both Copilot rounds on 3e285f38, both in the ccr-overview-v2 format, which states no file-coverage line (the shape #1692 measured):
Round 1 (review 5347043616): Findings: None. Its "What changed in this PR" table lists host-setup/agent-safety/claude/gh-write-guard.py, the only file in the pull request. No other collapsed section.
Round 2 (review 5347085050, requested explicitly per the exit's remedy): Findings: 1, Open (1), matching the one thread. That thread (an optional request to restore an explanatory comment) was declined with evidence and resolved: reverting the fix fails the new self-test rows.
CodeRabbit, prompted, reviewed the same range and generated no actionable comments.
Activity
ptr727 commentedon Sep 29, 2026
Answered by the maintainer: squash-merge as is, coverage unstated. #2033 merged to develop as dd4ca98.