[ptr727]

Closes on promotion: #3556

A Python profile belongs to each declared directory, so the registry no longer declares one.

• registry/repos.json: drops profiles.python from ProjectTemplate and ESPHome-Config. ProjectTemplate's profiles is now absent, and ESPHome-Config keeps cpp: lint-only.
• registry/repos.schema.json: profiles refuses a python key, matching the validator.
• spec/project-types.json: the python type allows no registry profile. profileNote and python.profile.detect say the directory's pyproject.toml shape is the profile. The check now states that a committed uv.lock or any [project] table means build.
• spec/validate.py: the profile check moves into profile_errors(). A profiles.python entry is refused with a message naming pythonDirectories and the pyproject.toml shape.
• spec/type-model.md: "Profiles: build vs lint-only" says the registry declares no python profile, and why. The false-declaration sentence is gone.
• tests/test_spec_validate.py: constructed fixtures cover the rejection, other types' profiles, and the shipped registry. One case runs the rejection through main().

Local pass findings

• spec/project-types.json python.profile.detect, introduced, fixed in 42b67fb: a pyproject.toml with a [project] table but no runtime dependencies, no [build-system], no uv.lock, and no requirements*.txt fitted neither stated shape. Before this change it was valid only when declared build, so any [project] table now means build.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[ptr727]

A recorded local strict-review pass covers head 84193a107a773449a7de839b0e62a3e64471fff4, the content this pull request carries at that commit against develop, and it recorded 1 finding.

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: ptr727/ProjectTemplate
• Branch: feature/3556-drop-registry-python-profile
• File: .coderabbit.yaml
• Commit: 42b67fb
• Layers: Repository YAML
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 0c769099-c2ad-41c1-a30b-69570fc97bf2

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[Copilot]

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

[ptr727]

A recorded local strict-review pass covers head 42b67fb323a80d033172eb848553d64432ad5d87, the content this pull request carries at that commit against develop, and it recorded 0 findings.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 92.85714% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 81.60%. Comparing base (a70a543) to head (42b67fb).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
spec/validate.py	92.85%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3569      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    81.50%   81.60%   +0.10%     
===========================================
  Files           26       26              
  Lines         9066     9070       +4     
===========================================
+ Hits          7389     7402      +13     
+ Misses        1677     1668       -9     

Flag	Coverage Δ
python-3.13	81.60% <92.85%> (+0.10%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.