Repository navigation
Grok Bot proactivity talking points - #7
Draft
AayushDongre wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
AayushDongre wants to merge 2 commits into
AayushDongre wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Draft brief for a content piece: what Grok Bot already ships (routines, skills, approvals), what this SDK adds (self-pacing, goal memory, crash-safe governance), and how to layer it on as a plugin rather than wrapping Grok Bot in proactive(). Co-authored-by: Aayush Dongre <AayushDongre@users.noreply.github.com>
Spell out what “weaker” means against proactive() and against OpenClaw/Hermes/Eve: cadence rides routines, no inject/transcript APIs, and computer-use cannot be governed. Fill in the Grok Bot pages the first pass missed (faq, mobile, get-started, files, troubleshooting). Co-authored-by: Aayush Dongre <AayushDongre@users.noreply.github.com>
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Draft talking points for a content piece on baking
@refix/proactivityinto Grok Bot.The brief is in
content/grok-bot-proactivity-talking-points.md(not product docs). It is based on the full 14-page Grok Bot docs corpus plus this repo’s plugin pattern.Answer: yes, it is possible. It is a weaker integration — and that is the plugin path this SDK already documents for hosts it does not own (Eve, OpenClaw, Hermes), not a Grok Bot-only failure.
Grok Bot would be closest to Eve: static cron (routines) plus a due-gate. Extra weakenings vs OpenClaw: no documented tool-intercept hook, so computer-use cannot be governed; connector/MCP writes can. No model picker for a cheaper
reflection.model.Do not wrap Grok Bot in
proactive(). Layer goals, briefing, cadence, and governance onto the loop it already owns.