[roboco-app]

Removes the dead no_helpers_in_routers rule and its comments from .roboco/conventions.yml, and rewords the posture and closing comments so they refer only to routes. no_helpers_in_routes is unchanged at warn. A yaml.safe_load before/after diff shows only the routers rule disappeared, and make gate passes.

Source of the 22 no_helpers_in_routers findings: not this repo. roboco-api has no routers/ directory and no module with a routers leaf, so the rule could never fire here. The only references to the rule name in this repo are unit-test fixtures (tests/unit/conventions/test_scan.py, tests/unit/foundation/policy/conventions/). Rule names are built as no_{kind}s_in_{leaf} (roboco/conventions/scan.py:157), and the scan heuristic lists routers as a route-module name (scan.py:50), so the rule is derived for any project that has a routers/ directory. The 22 findings therefore come from another project's derived conventions or from stale hotspot-ledger data. I had no ledger access to confirm which.

[github-actions]

Thanks for opening your first pull request on RoboCo!

Quick checklist before review (most of these are enforced by CI, but worth a glance):

• make quality — ruff format check, ruff check, mypy, pytest (≥80% coverage), and the rest of the gate
• Panel changes pass pnpm lint and pnpm exec tsc --noEmit (run from panel/)
• No # noqa / # type: ignore shortcuts; pre-existing violations in touched files are fixed
• Added an entry under ## [Unreleased] in CHANGELOG.md
• Signed the CLA (the bot will prompt you on this PR)
• Signed your commits — master requires verified signatures (SSH signing setup)
• Updated any affected docs under docs/

See CONTRIBUTING.md for the full workflow and the Code of Conduct for the community standards we follow.

Welcome aboard — a maintainer will review shortly.