The definition of the Order object (https://github.com/stapi-spec/stapi-spec/tree/main/order#order-object) includes a field user that doesn't seem to be used in any of the other repos in this organization (e.g. here is stapi-pydantic's Order model: https://github.com/stapi-spec/pystapi/blob/main/stapi-pydantic/src/stapi_pydantic/order.py#L88. A discussion at the 4/28/2025 community meeting brought up that most cases of user identification will need something more than a single string field as well as that this will likely vary between implementations. Given all of this, it seems like further discussion on the existence and/or definition of this field is needed.
The definition of the Order object (https://github.com/stapi-spec/stapi-spec/tree/main/order#order-object) includes a field
userthat doesn't seem to be used in any of the other repos in this organization (e.g. here isstapi-pydantic'sOrdermodel: https://github.com/stapi-spec/pystapi/blob/main/stapi-pydantic/src/stapi_pydantic/order.py#L88. A discussion at the 4/28/2025 community meeting brought up that most cases of user identification will need something more than a single string field as well as that this will likely vary between implementations. Given all of this, it seems like further discussion on the existence and/or definition of this field is needed.