Skip to content

Refactor maxrss calculation to consider children - #162

Merged
barisozbas merged 1 commit into
uber:mainfrom
MaddipatlaChetan24:patch-4
Oct 8, 2026
Merged

barisozbas merged 1 commit into
uber:mainfrom
MaddipatlaChetan24:patch-4

Conversation

@MaddipatlaChetan24

@MaddipatlaChetan24 MaddipatlaChetan24 commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • Refactor
  • Feature
  • Bug Fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update

Related issue: N/A

What changed?
main()'s --resource finally block now takes max(end_self.ru_maxrss, end_children.ru_maxrss) instead of end_self.ru_maxrss alone when computing max_rss_bytes.

Why?
The CPU metrics (cpu_user_seconds, cpu_system_seconds) already aggregate RUSAGE_SELF + RUSAGE_CHILDREN, but max_rss_bytes only read RUSAGE_SELF. Any run where a child process (e.g. a parser shelling out) held the peak memory would silently underreport it in resource.log.

How did you test it?
Reviewed the diff manually and compiled it (py_compile); no existing automated test covers resource.log output, so this is a logic-only fix, not independently exercised by a test run.

Potential risks
Low. max_rss_bytes can now be reported higher than before for runs that spawn subprocesses; no other field or behavior changes. No change to the default (non---resource) code path.

@barisozbas barisozbas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@barisozbas
barisozbas merged commit 3782cea into uber:main Oct 8, 2026
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants